Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 6, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA former Caucasian employee of Petco filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit claiming the company posted Spanish signage with no English translation and allowed him to repeatedly be taunted by his Hispanic co-workers. U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson, sitting in Trenton, ruled that the lawsuit can proceed after she denied the dismissal of claims lodged under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD).
As the only white employee working on the Petco distribution center floor, the plaintiff, Frank McQuillan, claims he has been subjected to a hostile work environment. McQuillan has worked for Petco as an “order picker” since 2012, which means he prepares orders to be shipped from the warehouse.
In determining that McQuillan met the heightened pleading standards required in a reverse-discrimination lawsuit, Judge Wolfson stated that there was sufficient causal connection between the plaintiff’s status as a white person and the harassment he allegedly was subjected to at Petco. The judge felt it was clear the plaintiff was treated differently because he is white.
In addition to the Spanish-only signage, McQuillan’s allegations included his Hispanic workers referring to him by using derogatory Spanish terms, improper conduct by management, and refusal to provide him with a scanning headset (which allows workers to work faster) that was provided to Hispanic employees hired after him.
McQuillan suffered a shoulder injury in January of 2013. A physician from Petco’s health carrier informed Petco’s management team that he could return to work on a light duty restriction, but McQuillan was told no such positions were available. As a result, McQuillan sought workers’ compensation benefits. Petco informed McQuillan’s lawyer to “just tell him he’s fired.”
Petco moved to dismiss McQuillan’s five claims under LAD. Judge Wolfson denied the motion as to three of those claims and dismissed the other two without prejudice. McQuillan was permitted to amend the two claims of disability discrimination because he failed to allege that Petco replaced him (or attempted to replace him) after his firing. McQuillan’s complaint was quickly amended to cure the deficiency and refiled.
If you have any questions about the case discussed or would like to discuss your company’s policies and procedures, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!