Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Complaint for Reverse Discrimination Upheld
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 6, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
A former Caucasian employee of Petco filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit claiming the company posted Spanish signage with no English translation and allowed him to repeatedly be taunted by his Hispanic co-workers. U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson, sitting in Trenton, ruled that the lawsuit can proceed after she denied the dismissal of claims lodged under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD).
As the only white employee working on the Petco distribution center floor, the plaintiff, Frank McQuillan, claims he has been subjected to a hostile work environment. McQuillan has worked for Petco as an “order picker” since 2012, which means he prepares orders to be shipped from the warehouse.
In determining that McQuillan met the heightened pleading standards required in a reverse-discrimination lawsuit, Judge Wolfson stated that there was sufficient causal connection between the plaintiff’s status as a white person and the harassment he allegedly was subjected to at Petco. The judge felt it was clear the plaintiff was treated differently because he is white.
In addition to the Spanish-only signage, McQuillan’s allegations included his Hispanic workers referring to him by using derogatory Spanish terms, improper conduct by management, and refusal to provide him with a scanning headset (which allows workers to work faster) that was provided to Hispanic employees hired after him.
McQuillan suffered a shoulder injury in January of 2013. A physician from Petco’s health carrier informed Petco’s management team that he could return to work on a light duty restriction, but McQuillan was told no such positions were available. As a result, McQuillan sought workers’ compensation benefits. Petco informed McQuillan’s lawyer to “just tell him he’s fired.”
Petco moved to dismiss McQuillan’s five claims under LAD. Judge Wolfson denied the motion as to three of those claims and dismissed the other two without prejudice. McQuillan was permitted to amend the two claims of disability discrimination because he failed to allege that Petco replaced him (or attempted to replace him) after his firing. McQuillan’s complaint was quickly amended to cure the deficiency and refiled.
If you have any questions about the case discussed or would like to discuss your company’s policies and procedures, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Complaint for Reverse Discrimination Upheld
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
A former Caucasian employee of Petco filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit claiming the company posted Spanish signage with no English translation and allowed him to repeatedly be taunted by his Hispanic co-workers. U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson, sitting in Trenton, ruled that the lawsuit can proceed after she denied the dismissal of claims lodged under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD).
As the only white employee working on the Petco distribution center floor, the plaintiff, Frank McQuillan, claims he has been subjected to a hostile work environment. McQuillan has worked for Petco as an “order picker” since 2012, which means he prepares orders to be shipped from the warehouse.
In determining that McQuillan met the heightened pleading standards required in a reverse-discrimination lawsuit, Judge Wolfson stated that there was sufficient causal connection between the plaintiff’s status as a white person and the harassment he allegedly was subjected to at Petco. The judge felt it was clear the plaintiff was treated differently because he is white.
In addition to the Spanish-only signage, McQuillan’s allegations included his Hispanic workers referring to him by using derogatory Spanish terms, improper conduct by management, and refusal to provide him with a scanning headset (which allows workers to work faster) that was provided to Hispanic employees hired after him.
McQuillan suffered a shoulder injury in January of 2013. A physician from Petco’s health carrier informed Petco’s management team that he could return to work on a light duty restriction, but McQuillan was told no such positions were available. As a result, McQuillan sought workers’ compensation benefits. Petco informed McQuillan’s lawyer to “just tell him he’s fired.”
Petco moved to dismiss McQuillan’s five claims under LAD. Judge Wolfson denied the motion as to three of those claims and dismissed the other two without prejudice. McQuillan was permitted to amend the two claims of disability discrimination because he failed to allege that Petco replaced him (or attempted to replace him) after his firing. McQuillan’s complaint was quickly amended to cure the deficiency and refiled.
If you have any questions about the case discussed or would like to discuss your company’s policies and procedures, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.