Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 16, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Most recently, two New York men were charged with stealing source code from Flow Traders L.L.C., a high-frequency trading firm in Manhattan. They planned to use the information to establish a competing business, according to criminal complaints filed by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance.
The court documents allege that former trader Jason Vuu sent trading strategies, valuation algorithms and proprietary code from his work email account to his personal email address. He subsequently shared the information with Simon Lu using file-hosting service Dropbox.
The latest charges follow the high-profile prosecution of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. programmer Sergey Aleynikov, who was also charged with misappropriating proprietary source code. As previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, federal charges were ultimately dismissed after the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that downloading proprietary computer code does not constitute stealing under the National Stolen Property Act, which criminalizes the theft of trade secrets. The state charges are still pending trial.
While there are criminal and civil remedies available in the case of source code misappropriation, the best defense is a strong offense. Given how easily technology can be used to facilitate trade secret theft, New York and New Jersey businesses brokerage firms should have strong intellectual property policies and procedures in place. These include non-disclosure agreements, non-compete agreements, and security protocols.
If you have any questions about the current trade secret theft case or would like to discuss how to better protect your firm, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!