
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 8, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOn Oct. 28th, a bankruptcy court presided over a cable channel dispute between Comcast SportsNet and local sports teams involving the fate of Comcast SportsNet Houston.
The regional sports network, which broadcasts games from the Houston Astros, Houston Rockets and Houston Dynamos, has failed to generate sufficient revenue and instead, has been dependent upon the financial support of broadcasted teams to stay afloat, according to the Houston Chronicle.
On Sep. 27, the Astros filed a motion to dismiss an involuntary Chapter 11 case filed against Comcast SportsNet and to oppose Comcast’s appeal for an interim trustee to be appointed for the company.
In a submission to U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur, the Astros alleged that Comcast is using the bankruptcy in an attempt to expand its authority within the market.
“Comcast’s allegations … are a smoke screen, designed to hide what is really going on here,” the Astros said in a statement, according to the news source. “Comcast orchestrated a collusive involuntary bankruptcy filing and is attempting … to facilitate its plan to acquire the network’s assets and the Astros’ media rights without the Astros’ consent.”
Problems between Comcast and its affiliates have been well-documented since CSN Houston’s 2012 launch. Unable to secure carriage deals with cable systems such as DirecTV, Dish Network, AT&T U-verse and Suddenlink, CSN Houston is available in only 40 percent of households out of the possible 2.2 million that represent the Houston metro area, the Houston Chronicle reported.
After Comcast failed to send three monthly rights fee payments, the Astros were allegedly close to withdrawing media rights before the company filed for protection under Chapter 11 bankruptcy law.
“If this bankruptcy case goes forward, the business can survive,” wrote attorneys for Comcast. “If the case is dismissed, it will not.”
Businesses affiliated with Comcast, including National Digital Television Center, CSN California, Comcast Sports Management Services and Houston SportsNet Finance, claim that if the bankruptcy case is dismissed, it could result in the network’s collapse, as well as the loss of millions of dollars in anticipated value, Chron reported.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!