
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 12, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOn Oct. 5, City Sports, a Boston-based athletic gear retailer, announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to the Wall Street Journal, City Sports plans to liquidate eight of its 26 remaining store locations.
The 32-year old company has recently fallen on economic hard times due to a failed expansion strategy that saw City Sports locations move to expensive, high foot traffic locations. According to a Boston.com report, City Sports cited the fact that it had decided to aggressively expand beyond the Boston area into the biggest cities in the U.S. to ensure urban pedestrian access. However, the expansion plan was derailed by several factors that proved to be too much for the company to remain solvent.
In court papers, the company also cited the fact that the Northeast had experienced one of the worst winters in its history, which led to unprecedented decreases in sales revenues. However, City Sports also stated that the increasing competition from larger athletic retailers like Sports Authority, Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corp. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. as one of the main reasons for the company’s drop in business.
This slip in revenues led the company to cut costs by reducing store hours, employee hours, its workforce and its shipping costs. These changes did not prevent the company from hemorrhaging losses in recent years due to its exorbitant lease contracts. City Sports was forced to seek bankruptcy protection because the savings it achieved from leasing cost reductions was not enough to keep the company from insolvency.
City Sports listed $38.6 million in assets and $39.6 million in liabilities in court documents. According to the Boston Business Journal, City Sports’ list of creditors includes unsecured claims from Nike USA Inc. for $1.27 million, Under Armour Performance Apparel for $1.04 million, Asics America Corp. for $1.03 million, Patagonia Inc. for $1 million and The North Face for $968,300.
The company has requested approval from the court for an asset auction. City Sports is also in the process of negotiating a deal with Tiger Capital Group to facilitate closing sales at eight of the company’s remaining 26 stores throughout the Northeast. For the other 18 store locations, City Sports is negotiating with potential buyers who will choose whether to continue operations at these locations or liquidate all of their remaining assets. In the event that no financing or sale agreements are reached for the remaining 18 locations by Nov. 1, City Sports will be forced into liquidation.
In its bankruptcy petition, the company stated that it is currently discussing the store locations with several prospective buyers that have expressed interested in maintaining operations.
City Sports stated that it intends to emerge from the bankruptcy period as a viable business, and that it does not intend to close any of its Boston locations. The company explained in court papers that it will continue to operate each of its store locations as well as its online retailers because the reorganization process is only expected to take up to three months.
There is no word yet as to the number of store closures that will take place after the initial sales of the eight underperforming locations.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!