
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: September 23, 2013
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comIt is not difficult to leave a business to charity, one makes a bequest. The difficulty, however, arises from the administrative and compliance issues faced as a result of such a charitable bequest make it impractical in most instances. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) imposes numerous restrictions on these tax practices and discourages non-profit organizations from competing directly against for-profit companies in commercial setting. (Imagine the competitive advantage you would have if your business were not subject to income tax.)
IRC §4943 prohibits private foundations from having excess business holdings in a business enterprise. A private foundation is a type of exempt organization that receives substantial support from only a few contributors or sources. Unlike many of the well-known public charities that receive contributions from thousands of people, a private foundation is controlled by a few substantial contributors. The IRC imposes tighter restrictions upon private foundations because of the absence of public oversight and de facto control by the contributors is suspect in the eyes of the IRS.
There are two exceptions. First, a business whose income is substantially (95% or more) passive in character. This makes sense because the IRC has the opportunity to tax a corporation that pays dividends, so there is no fear that business income will escape taxation.
The second exception is for a functionally related business (“FRB”) and it is rarely used. This is why PLR 201323029 is so interesting. FRB is defined as a business that is not an unrelated trade or business or is an activity which is carried on within a group of activities which are related to the exempt purpose of an organization. A classic example is a medical journal that reports on medical developments, but also contains medical advertising which is deemed related to the exempt purpose.
PLR 201323029 described an artist’s foundation that was dedicated to the creation and exhibition of art as well as art education. The artist’s business was held in a for-profit corporation. Upon the artist’s death, ownership of the corporation’s shares would pass to the foundation that would use the revenue to support its programs.
The usefulness of this PLR may be limited; however, it is important to notice that the foundations efforts to advance art were ongoing during the artist’s lifetime. It may have been helpful to obtaining the ruling that the charitable activities being conducted were already qualified and the applicant need only promise that they continue after death.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
NYC Real Estate and Litigation Attorney Ryan O. Miller and Team Join Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC New York City, NY – August 13, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has strengthened its Real Estate and Litigation practices with the addition of four New York City-based attorneys. Ryan Miller, who joins as a partner, is well known for […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!