
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: March 4, 2014

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comReorganizations under IRC §368(a)(1)(F) (“F Reorganizations”) are mere changes in form, such as changing a state of incorporation. This change may be made for any number of reasons, although choice of law or no longer doing business in the state are common. F Reorganizations in the international context involve consideration of many more substantive issues.
One must consider international tax law as the backdrop. PLR 201328003 sets forth a factual background of a structure used in international settings. It involves a foreign entity that has several subsidiaries, all of whom are disregarded. Taxpayers may obtain a benefit from making the check-the-box election to convert a foreign business entity into an entity that is disregarded for federal income tax purposes (DRE). DREs allow taxpayers to navigate the complex world of international taxation more efficiently. Consider that Subpart F taxes income that is not derived from an active trade or business or is re-routed through or to tax advantaged jurisdictions. The essence of the Subpart F regime is the taxation of income that is not repatriated, for whatever reason, to the U.S. Another set of rules faced by corporations is the foreign tax credit (FTC). The U.S. taxes worldwide income, which includes income earned and taxed in foreign jurisdictions. The FTC brings with it certain computational difficulties and limitations.
Some complexity can be eliminated through the use of DRE. PLR 201328003 describes such a DRE structure that was crafted to adapt to these rules. Foreign parent (“FP”) owns Target which is formed under the laws of a foreign country. Target owns several subsidiaries. Target filed to domesticate itself in a state, which was a taxable transaction. Despite the inbound taxable event, the tiered subsidiaries were all disregarded entities. DREs are branches of the parent, in this case the Target. One of the unique features of DRE’s is that they allow what is, in effect, consolidated return groups to be formed across borders. The benefit of this feature is the ability of a corporation to combine activities of entities in several different countries to avoid, to a degree, Subpart F and FTC.
Some jurisdictions allow for cross-border consolidations and advertise this attractive feature. Although the U.S. does not permit consolidated groups to include non-U.S. companies, use of DRE’s accomplishes the same.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!