Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAuthor: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC|April 8, 2016
Monmouth County businesses have another “cybercop” to worry about. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) recently pursued its first cybersecurity enforcement action, alleging that Dwolla, Inc., an online payment platform, misled consumers about its data security practices.
Dwolla operates an online payment system with more than 650,000 users and conducts transactions of more than $5 million per day. For each account, Dwolla collects personal information including the consumer’s name, address, date of birth, telephone number, Social Security number, bank account and routing numbers, a password, and a unique 4-digit PIN.
According to the CFPB, Dwolla failed to employ reasonable and appropriate measures to protect data obtained from consumers from unauthorized access, although it represented to consumers that its data-security practices “surpass” or “exceed” industry standards. Most notably, the company allegedly failed to encrypt sensitive consumer information stored on its servers and released applications without conducting sufficient security testing. Although Dwolla maintained that its transactions, servers, and data centers were compliant with the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Security Standard, the CFPB alleged that Dwolla’s data security practices in fact, fell far short.
In pursuing the enforcement action, the CFPB relied on its authority under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which empowers the agency to take action against institutions engaged in unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices, or that otherwise violate federal consumer financial laws. The agency based the action on the company’s misrepresentations to consumers rather than any deficiency in its cybersecurity practices.
To resolve the enforcement action, Dwolla agreed to pay a penalty of $100,000 and entered into a five-year consent agreement. The consent order requires Dwolla to adopt and implement reasonable and appropriate data-security measures to protect consumers’ personal information on its computer networks and applications. More specifically, the company must:
Pursuant to the consent order, Dwolla’s Board of Directors is tasked with ensuring compliance going forward. The agreement specifically states that the “Board will have the ultimate responsibility for proper and sound management of Respondent and for ensuring that it complies with Federal consumer financial law and this Consent Order.”
The CFPB will be policing businesses under its purview to make sure they have “reasonable” cybersecurity policies and procedures in place. As highlighted in the consent order, the CFPB believes that businesses should be conducting bi-annual risk assessments, regularly reviewing customer-facing privacy policies to ensure they match current practices, and involving the highest levels of management, including the board of directors, in all cybersecurity-related decisions.
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comMonmouth County businesses have another “cybercop” to worry about. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) recently pursued its first cybersecurity enforcement action, alleging that Dwolla, Inc., an online payment platform, misled consumers about its data security practices.
Dwolla operates an online payment system with more than 650,000 users and conducts transactions of more than $5 million per day. For each account, Dwolla collects personal information including the consumer’s name, address, date of birth, telephone number, Social Security number, bank account and routing numbers, a password, and a unique 4-digit PIN.
According to the CFPB, Dwolla failed to employ reasonable and appropriate measures to protect data obtained from consumers from unauthorized access, although it represented to consumers that its data-security practices “surpass” or “exceed” industry standards. Most notably, the company allegedly failed to encrypt sensitive consumer information stored on its servers and released applications without conducting sufficient security testing. Although Dwolla maintained that its transactions, servers, and data centers were compliant with the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Security Standard, the CFPB alleged that Dwolla’s data security practices in fact, fell far short.
In pursuing the enforcement action, the CFPB relied on its authority under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which empowers the agency to take action against institutions engaged in unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices, or that otherwise violate federal consumer financial laws. The agency based the action on the company’s misrepresentations to consumers rather than any deficiency in its cybersecurity practices.
To resolve the enforcement action, Dwolla agreed to pay a penalty of $100,000 and entered into a five-year consent agreement. The consent order requires Dwolla to adopt and implement reasonable and appropriate data-security measures to protect consumers’ personal information on its computer networks and applications. More specifically, the company must:
Pursuant to the consent order, Dwolla’s Board of Directors is tasked with ensuring compliance going forward. The agreement specifically states that the “Board will have the ultimate responsibility for proper and sound management of Respondent and for ensuring that it complies with Federal consumer financial law and this Consent Order.”
The CFPB will be policing businesses under its purview to make sure they have “reasonable” cybersecurity policies and procedures in place. As highlighted in the consent order, the CFPB believes that businesses should be conducting bi-annual risk assessments, regularly reviewing customer-facing privacy policies to ensure they match current practices, and involving the highest levels of management, including the board of directors, in all cybersecurity-related decisions.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.