Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

CFPB Makes Example of Dwolla Inc. in Monmouth County

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: April 8, 2016

Key Contacts

Back

CFPB Makes Example of Dwolla Inc. in Monmouth County

CFPB Makes Example of Dwolla Inc. in Monmouth County

Monmouth County businesses have another “cybercop” to worry about. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) recently pursued its first cybersecurity enforcement action, alleging that Dwolla, Inc., an online payment platform, misled consumers about its data security practices.

The CFPB’s Allegations

Dwolla operates an online payment system with more than 650,000 users and conducts transactions of more than $5 million per day. For each account, Dwolla collects personal information including the consumer’s name, address, date of birth, telephone number, Social Security number, bank account and routing numbers, a password, and a unique 4-digit PIN.

According to the CFPB, Dwolla failed to employ reasonable and appropriate measures to protect data obtained from consumers from unauthorized access, although it represented to consumers that its data-security practices “surpass” or “exceed” industry standards. Most notably, the company allegedly failed to encrypt sensitive consumer information stored on its servers and released applications without conducting sufficient security testing. Although Dwolla maintained that its transactions, servers, and data centers were compliant with the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Security Standard, the CFPB alleged that Dwolla’s data security practices in fact, fell far short.

In pursuing the enforcement action, the CFPB relied on its authority under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which empowers the agency to take action against institutions engaged in unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices, or that otherwise violate federal consumer financial laws. The agency based the action on the company’s misrepresentations to consumers rather than any deficiency in its cybersecurity practices.

The Consent Order

To resolve the enforcement action, Dwolla agreed to pay a penalty of $100,000 and entered into a five-year consent agreement. The consent order requires Dwolla to adopt and implement reasonable and appropriate data-security measures to protect consumers’ personal information on its computer networks and applications. More specifically, the company must:

  • Establish, implement, and maintain a written, comprehensive data-security plan that is reasonably designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of sensitive consumer information;
  • Designate a qualified person to coordinate and be accountable for the data-security program;
  • Conduct data-security risk assessments twice annually of each area of relevant operation to identify internal and external risks to the security, confidentiality, and integrity of the network, systems, or apps, and to consumers’ sensitive consumer information stored by Respondent, and to assess the sufficiency of any safeguards in place to control these risks;
  • Conduct regular, mandatory employee training on a) the Company’s data-security policies and procedures; b) the safe handling of consumers’ sensitive personal information; and c) secure software design, development and testing.
  • Develop, implement, and update, as required, security patches to fix any security vulnerabilities identified in any web or mobile application;
  • Develop, implement and maintain an appropriate method of customer identity authentication at the registration phase and before effecting a funds transfer;
  • Obtain an annual data-security audit from an independent, qualified third-party, which must be submitted to the CFPB.

Pursuant to the consent order, Dwolla’s Board of Directors is tasked with ensuring compliance going forward. The agreement specifically states that the “Board will have the ultimate responsibility for proper and sound management of Respondent and for ensuring that it complies with Federal consumer financial law and this Consent Order.”

The Message for Monmouth County Businesses

The CFPB will be policing businesses under its purview to make sure they have “reasonable” cybersecurity policies and procedures in place. As highlighted in the consent order, the CFPB believes that businesses should be conducting bi-annual risk assessments, regularly reviewing customer-facing privacy policies to ensure they match current practices, and involving the highest levels of management, including the board of directors, in all cybersecurity-related decisions.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney post image

What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney"
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract post image

Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]

Author: Graham Staton

Link to post with title - "Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract"
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement? post image

Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?"
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One post image

Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One"
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know post image

Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]

Author: Donald M. Pepe

Link to post with title - "Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know"
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split post image

Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!