James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
A number of companies have coming under scrutiny in recent months, as the U.S. reconsiders its corporate tax policy. The latest of these companies is the Peoria-based construction equipment manufacturer Caterpillar Inc., which is being probed by a U.S. Senate investigative panel to find out whether it avoided taxes by improperly moving profits overseas, according to Bloomberg. Two people familiar with the matter told the news source that the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing in early April. Rachel Potts, a spokeswoman for Caterpillar, and Gordon Trowbridge, a spokesman for Subcommittee Chairman Carl Levin, both declined to comment.
Caterpillar’s overall tax rate has fallen steadily over the last 14 years, as it has moved more of its profits outside the U.S., according to Financial Times. The company was paying a tax rate of 32 percent in 1999, a number that fell to 25.7 percent in 2013. Over the same period of time, Caterpillar’s activities outside of the U.S. fell from 26 percent of its profits to 62 percent.
In 2009, Caterpillar Inc. was accused by then tax strategy employee Daniel Schlicksup of using a “Swiss structure” to offshore profits resulting in a $2 billion reduction in the companies tax rate, according to Bloomberg. According to the complaint, the Swiss structure involved “many shell corporations with no business operations,” in which management was shifted to offshore companies while in actuality continuing in the U.S. Schlicksup’s complaint also alleged that Caterpillar used a “Bermuda structure” to repatriate profits without paying U.S. taxes.
Schlicksup’s lawsuit, including the allegation that Caterpillar executives had retaliated against him, was settled in 2012, according to the news source. Caterpillar executives denied the allegations.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Caterpillar Inc faces tax probe
Author: James F. McDonough
A number of companies have coming under scrutiny in recent months, as the U.S. reconsiders its corporate tax policy. The latest of these companies is the Peoria-based construction equipment manufacturer Caterpillar Inc., which is being probed by a U.S. Senate investigative panel to find out whether it avoided taxes by improperly moving profits overseas, according to Bloomberg. Two people familiar with the matter told the news source that the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing in early April. Rachel Potts, a spokeswoman for Caterpillar, and Gordon Trowbridge, a spokesman for Subcommittee Chairman Carl Levin, both declined to comment.
Caterpillar’s overall tax rate has fallen steadily over the last 14 years, as it has moved more of its profits outside the U.S., according to Financial Times. The company was paying a tax rate of 32 percent in 1999, a number that fell to 25.7 percent in 2013. Over the same period of time, Caterpillar’s activities outside of the U.S. fell from 26 percent of its profits to 62 percent.
In 2009, Caterpillar Inc. was accused by then tax strategy employee Daniel Schlicksup of using a “Swiss structure” to offshore profits resulting in a $2 billion reduction in the companies tax rate, according to Bloomberg. According to the complaint, the Swiss structure involved “many shell corporations with no business operations,” in which management was shifted to offshore companies while in actuality continuing in the U.S. Schlicksup’s complaint also alleged that Caterpillar used a “Bermuda structure” to repatriate profits without paying U.S. taxes.
Schlicksup’s lawsuit, including the allegation that Caterpillar executives had retaliated against him, was settled in 2012, according to the news source. Caterpillar executives denied the allegations.