
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.com
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comA number of companies have coming under scrutiny in recent months, as the U.S. reconsiders its corporate tax policy. The latest of these companies is the Peoria-based construction equipment manufacturer Caterpillar Inc., which is being probed by a U.S. Senate investigative panel to find out whether it avoided taxes by improperly moving profits overseas, according to Bloomberg. Two people familiar with the matter told the news source that the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing in early April. Rachel Potts, a spokeswoman for Caterpillar, and Gordon Trowbridge, a spokesman for Subcommittee Chairman Carl Levin, both declined to comment.
Caterpillar’s overall tax rate has fallen steadily over the last 14 years, as it has moved more of its profits outside the U.S., according to Financial Times. The company was paying a tax rate of 32 percent in 1999, a number that fell to 25.7 percent in 2013. Over the same period of time, Caterpillar’s activities outside of the U.S. fell from 26 percent of its profits to 62 percent.
In 2009, Caterpillar Inc. was accused by then tax strategy employee Daniel Schlicksup of using a “Swiss structure” to offshore profits resulting in a $2 billion reduction in the companies tax rate, according to Bloomberg. According to the complaint, the Swiss structure involved “many shell corporations with no business operations,” in which management was shifted to offshore companies while in actuality continuing in the U.S. Schlicksup’s complaint also alleged that Caterpillar used a “Bermuda structure” to repatriate profits without paying U.S. taxes.
Schlicksup’s lawsuit, including the allegation that Caterpillar executives had retaliated against him, was settled in 2012, according to the news source. Caterpillar executives denied the allegations.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!