
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 31, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comCasey Anthony, the 26-year-old woman acquitted of killing her 2-year-old daughter in a 2011 trial that created a national uproar, has filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection.
Anthony filed her bankruptcy in a federal court in Tampa, Florida, claiming $1,100 in assets and $792,000 in liabilities. In court documents, Anthony listed debts of $500,000 for legal fees incurred during the trial; $145,660 for the Orange County Sheriff’s office relating to a judgment covering investigative fees and costs related to the case; $68,540 for the Internal Revenue Service for taxes, interest and penalties; and $61,505 for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement for court costs, according to The Associated Press.
Anthony also named nearly 80 creditors in her court filing, with debts related to several categories ranging from medical and psychiatric services to scuba diving lessons, the AP reports.
Under Chapter 7 bankruptcy, a trustee will be assigned to take possession of and sell Anthony’s non-exempt property and assets, the sale proceeds of which will be used to pay creditors. However, Anthony currently lists herself as unemployed and with few assets. Although many of the debts may be discharged through Chapter 7 bankruptcy, there are some balances that may not be eliminated through bankruptcy protection, such as certain taxes owed to the IRS and federal student loans.
In addition to her financial troubles, Anthony is also the target of several lawsuits, including defamation lawsuits that came about following her murder trial, and another from the state of Florida, which is trying to recoup investigative costs.
Although Anthony filed for bankruptcy in Tampa, using her parent’s home address, her exact residence and location have been kept secret to protect her from the angry backlash that resulted from her acquittal.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!