The U.S. House of Representatives recently approved the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act...
The U.S. House of Representatives recently approved the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. This is the fifth time the House has approved the cannabis banking reform bill since it was first introduced in 2019. This time around, the SAFE Banking Act passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act.
Key Provisions of SAFE Banking Act
As discussed in greater detail in prior articles, the SAFE Banking Act seeks to improve access to financial services for legal cannabis businesses. Because marijuana remains illegal under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), financial institutions providing banking services to legitimate and licensed cannabis businesses under state laws can face criminal prosecution under several federal statutes, such as “aiding and abetting” a federal crime and money laundering. In light of the liability risks, many banks are hesitant to provide services to the cannabis industry. As a result, cannabis businesses must deal exclusively in cash, which can make them targets for robberies and other types of crime.
The SAFE Banking Act seeks to increase access to financial institutions for legal cannabis businesses. Specifically, the bill would prevent federal banking regulators from:
Prohibiting, penalizing, or discouraging a bank from providing financial services to a legitimate state-sanctioned and regulated cannabis business, or an associated business (such as a vendor or landlord providing services to a legal cannabis business);
Prohibiting, penalizing or discouraging an insurer from providing insurance products to a legitimate, state-sanctioned and regulated cannabis business, or an associated business (such as a vendor or landlord providing services to a legal cannabis business);
Terminating or limiting a bank’s federal deposit insurance solely because the bank is providing services to a state-sanctioned cannabis business or associated business;
Recommending or incentivizing a bank to halt or downgrade providing any kind of banking services to these businesses; or
Taking any action on a loan to an owner or operator of a cannabis-related business.
The federal cannabis banking reform bill also creates a safe harbor from criminal prosecution and liability, as well as asset forfeiture, for banks who provide financial services to legitimate, state-sanctioned cannabis businesses. At the same time, it also preserves banks’ right to choose not to offer those services. The protections of the SAFE Banking Act also extend to hemp and hemp-derived CBD-related businesses.
What’s Next?
The Senate must now approve the SAFE Banking Act, which has proven to be a significant challenge in the past. Nonetheless, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), who is sponsoring the SAFE Banking Act in the Senate, expressed hope that his chamber would also pass the measure as part of the larger National Defense Authorization Act. “I’m hoping we can have similar success in the Senate,” he said. “This is a moment. The House has acted once again to push for this to be successfully passed in the counterpart in the Senate, or to get it done in conference with the House language.”
There are still hurdles for the Senate to approve the SAFE Banking, including members of Sen. Merkley’s own party that are pushing for comprehensive cannabis reform rather than more incremental cannabis banking legislation. With the Senate effectively split 50-50, sponsors will need to convince several Republicans or all of the Democrats to get on board.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Dan McKillop, Teddy Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
This article is a part of a series pertaining to cannabis legalization in New Jersey and the United States at large. Prior articles in this series are below:
Disclaimer: Possession, use, distribution, and/or sale of cannabis is a Federal crime and is subject to related Federal policy. Legal advice provided by Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is designed to counsel clients regarding the validity, scope, meaning, and application of existing and/or proposed cannabis law. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC will not provide assistance in circumventing Federal or state cannabis law or policy, and advice provided by our office should not be construed as such.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
