Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 2, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comInternet Service Providers (ISPs) that conduct business with the State of New Jersey must follow the principles of net neutrality under an executive order issued by Gov. Phil Murphy. The order responds to the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) controversial decision to end net neutrality on the federal level.

In basic terms, the term “net neutrality” refers to treating everything on the Internet equally with the goal of preserving its openness. Users are guaranteed the same connection speeds, as well as the same access to platforms like YouTube and Netflix, with no preferential treatment given to a specific service by their particular ISP. Accordingly, ISPs can’t block or slow access to a site because it competes with their services.
In 2015, the FCC adopted strong guidelines for ISPs that included reclassification of broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act. The Open Internet Rules also banned certain practices, such as:
Gov. Murphy issued Executive Order 9 on February 5, 2018. It directs that New Jersey state agencies may only buy Internet service from ISPs that adhere to net neutrality principles. It specifically provides: “The Division of Purchase and Property, within the Department of the Treasury, and all other contracting units or officials of any State entity, shall require that all future contracts for Internet, data, and telecommunications (Internet and broadband) be awarded only to ISPs that adhere to ‘net neutrality’ principles.”
Under Executive Order 9, adherence to “net neutrality” principles means that an ISP may not, with respect to any consumers in New Jersey (including but not limited to State entities):
The executive order further provides that “adherence to ‘net neutrality’ principles means that an ISP shall not [violate the rules] with respect to any consumers in New Jersey (including but not limited to State entities).” ISPs must specifically provide the following to all New Jersey customers: accurate information regarding the network and transport management practices (including cellular data and wireless broadband transport), and performance and commercial terms of its broadband Internet access services sufficient for consumers to make informed choices regarding use of such services and for content, application, service, and device providers to develop, market, and maintain Internet offerings.
“We may not agree with everything we see online, but that does not give us a justifiable reason to block the free, uninterrupted, and indiscriminate flow of information,” Governor Murphy said. “And, it certainly doesn’t give certain companies or individuals a right to pay their way to the front of the line. While New Jersey cannot unilaterally regulate net neutrality back into law or cement it as a state regulation, we can exercise our power as a consumer to make our preferences known.”
The executive order will apply to all contracts between state entities and ISPs that are executed on or after July 1. Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York State previously issued an executive order that mandates that ISPs adhere to net neutrality rules or forfeit the ability to contract in New York state. The state of Montana has done the same within its jurisdiction.
The FCC’s repeal of the Open Internet Order also preempts states from enacting their own net neutrality rules. That’s why the executive orders issued by the governors of New Jersey, New York, and Montana exclusively target ISPs that provide Internet service to state agencies.
The Internet Association (IA), the lobbying group representing the country’s largest Internet companies, such as Facebook, Google, Amazon, and eBay, is continuing to put pressure on Congress to restore net neutrality. In an open letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY), IA argued that net neutrality is essential to combating the ill effects of the broadband monopolies that exist in many areas of the country. It called on lawmakers to use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn the FCC’s action. The CRA allows Congress to overturn any federal regulation enacted within the past 60 days.
“Americans rely on and deserve the lasting certainty of an open internet enshrined in the U.S. Code. Strong net neutrality rules are necessitated by, among other factors, the lack of competition in the broadband service market,” wrote Michael Beckerman, president and CEO of the IA. “More than half of all Americans have no choice in their provider, and 87 percent of rural Americans have no choice. The CRA is an important step in solidifying open internet protections.”
The FCC’s decision to rollback net neutrality is also facing legal challenges from 21 states. In addition, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently agreed to look into the claims that millions of American citizens had been fraudulently impersonated during the FCC’s public comment process.
For ISPs and the customers that rely on them, net neutrality will continue to be an evolving issue. The FCC’s repeal of the Open Internet Order is currently the subject of litigation in federal court. At the same time, states executive orders may also face legal challenges. Businesses in industries impacted by net neutrality should stay on top of legal developments and discuss their potential implications with experienced counsel.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, David Einhorn,or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!