Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

DOL Overtime Regulations Will Impact Employers

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: May 26, 2016

Key Contacts

Back

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently issued a Final Rule updating the overtime regulations governing pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

New Jersey employers should become aware of these new overtime regulations, promptly evaluate how the final rule will impact employee compensation and determine how to address the potential implementation costs.

Overtime regulations

Under the FLSA, “employees must receive overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than time and one-half their regular rates of pay, unless they are specifically exempted. The most notable FLSA overtime exemption covers “executive, administrative and professional” employees and is often referred to as the “white collar” exemption. To qualify, employees generally must satisfy certain tests regarding their job duties as well as meet a salary threshold set by the DOL.

As previously discussed on our Business Law blog, President Barack Obama signed a Presidential Memorandum in 2014, directing the Department of Labor to update the overtime regulations. In his directive, the President highlighted that the thresholds of the salary test have failed to keep pace with inflation, only being updated twice in the last 40 years.

The DOL’s final changes to the salary test rules

Some changes made to the salary test rules were as follows:

  • Raises the standard salary level for the “salary test” for the exemption at the 40th percentile of weekly earnings for full-time salaried workers, which increases the salary threshold from $23,660 to $47,476 per year;
  • Increases the total annual compensation requirement needed to exempt highly compensated employees (HCEs) to the annualized value of the 90th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salaried workers ($122,148 annually), which raises the threshold from $100,000 to $134,004;
  • Establishes a mechanism for automatically updating the salary and compensation levels every three years to ensure that they will continue to provide a useful and effective test for exemption.

Notably, the DOL did not make any changes to the requirements of the current “duties test,” which is used to determine whether salaried workers earning more than the threshold salary test are exempt from overtime rules.

So what’s next?

It is recommended that a top-to-bottom wage review be conducted to determine what changes to current wage practices and structures may be necessary to accommodate these new requirements.

The DOL’s final rule will take effect on December 1, 2016, with the initial increases to the standard salary level and the HCE total annual compensation requirement starting on that date. According to the White House, the updated overtime rule will extend overtime protections to 4.2 million white-collar workers within the first year of its implementation. Accordingly, it will also have a tremendous impact on employers.

It is recommended that a top-to-bottom wage review be conducted to determine what changes to current wage practices and structures may be necessary to accommodate these new requirements. The fact that a worker goes from being classified “exempt” to “non-exempt” does not mean, necessarily, that such employee will receive more pay. What will change is the need to establish a “rate of pay” and overtime rate while also keeping careful and accurate track of all hours worked in a work week. Newly non-exempt employees must be paid overtime pay for all hours worked in excess of 40.

In some instances, an employer may choose to raise an exempt worker’s annual compensation to maintain such exemption if the cost of such raise is affordable.

There is no “right way” to make these adjustments. It is important, however, that employers engage in a thoughtful review of current pay practices to determine what adjustments, if any, will be necessary. Job descriptions are just one example of where review of terms and adjustment of rates should be considered.

The time to engage in this process is now as the implementation/compliance date is a little more than six months away. However, if you have any questions about this process or need to discuss any labor & employment matters, please contact me, Gary Young.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!