
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 25, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.com
Biotech firm Savient Pharmaceuticals has sought protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law, due to years of disappointing sales for its primary product Krystexxa.
The Bridgewater, New Jersey-based company filed for protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, and said in its filing that it will sell its assets to Sloane Holdings CV for roughly $55 million. Under the agreement, Sloane will serve as the stalking horse bidder in a court supervised auction of the company’s assets. The proposed deal with Sloane sets the floor, or minimum acceptable bid, and is subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, among other conditions.
The firm listed $260 million in liabilities and $74 million in assets. According to Reuters, Savient’s largest creditor has been pressuring it to liquidate in recent years.
The company manufactures Krystexxa, an alternative treatment for gout that has been marketed to those who failed to respond to traditional therapies and medicines. After developing the drug in 2010, however, low sales volume damaged the company financially and rendered it unable to meet its creditor obligations.
“The Board and management team have conducted a rigorous assessment of all of our strategic options and believe that this process represents the best possible solution for Savient, taking into account our financial and operational issues and helping to unlock the value of Krystexxa,” said Stephen Jaeger, chairman of the board of Savient.
However, the company noted that it plans to make the gout treatment drug commercially available throughout the U.S. during its bankruptcy proceedings. In addition, Savient has negotiated with its senior secured noteholders to ensure it has sufficient liquidity to conduct its business uninterrupted and to continue to meet its operational financial obligations. The biotech firm will also maintain employee wages and salaries, as well as its worker benefits program.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!