Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 11, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comGovernor Andrew Cuomo recently announced that the “Big Ugly” $1.3 billion rebate check program will be installed to offset New York state property taxes. In accordance with the legislation, 2.5 million homeowners that make under $500,000 will receive a property tax rebate check for $185 this year.
According to the final agreement, property taxpayers that qualify for the Big Ugly rebate check program will receive the standard $185 check the first year, then have this amount scaled for the remaining three years depending on their location and income. However, the deal also involves a four-year extension of the property tax cap program with two new exclusion clauses including payments to the Board of Cooperative Educational Services and payments-in-lieu of taxes.
In order to qualify for the rebate program, the school district of the taxpayer must remain under the property tax cap. However, the law was structured so that thousands of homeowners in the upstate region will receive the $185 rebate check in the first year, but by the second year of the program, qualifications for the rebate are based on a homeowners’ School Tax Relief property tax savings. This means that taxpayers making under $75,000 will receive a rebate check for 28 percent of the value of the savings, while those making under $150,000 will receive a check for 20.5 percent.
Those who qualify for the program in the fourth year will see their rebate benefits increase. For example, those individuals who make less than $75,000 will receive 85 percent of the STAR savings, and 60 percent for those making under $150,000. Ultimately by the end of the final year, homeowners in these income brackets will receive $530 in tax rebates on average throughout the duration of the program.
The qualifications for homeowners change as each region has their own specific income threshold. For instance, in upstate New York, the income threshold to qualify for the rebate check program is $200,000, whereas this threshold is $275,000 on Long Island. The rebate program was not made available for property owners in New York City, although this region is expected to contribute to the tax pool for the program. There are also problems associated with check-mailing plans due to the fact that New York state spent $1.6 million to mail out four million refund checks.
All told, the Big Ugly bill will total $3.1 billion in rebates over four years, with $1.3 billion in the final year.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!