Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Battery Maker A123 Systems Wins Final Bankruptcy Approval
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 31, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Failed battery maker A123 Systems wins final bankruptcy approval and will be permitted to move forward with its reorganization plan, a U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Carey approved the company’s plan to exit bankruptcy after using the proceeds from its asset sales to repay its creditors. The battery manufacturer, now named B456 Systems, faced several disputes from creditors that inhibited it from formerly emerging from bankruptcy, including a bitter disagreement between its official creditors committee and auto parts maker Johnson Controls Inc., which lost a bid to acquire the company. Instead, the company was sold to Chinese auto parts manufacturer Wanxiang Group Corp. for roughly $257 million.
Following the sale, the creditors committee accused Johnson Controls of trying to undermine the sale after losing the bid. The latter agreed to pay a settlement of $200,000 to A123 Systems’ bankruptcy estate, and the committee agreed to drop future claims against it. The settlement largely paved the way for the former battery maker to emerge from proceedings.
The company is expected to exit bankruptcy in roughly three to four weeks, and representatives said they are “thrilled with the result,” according to Bloomberg. While court documents have not yet disclosed firm financial figures, creditors are expected to recover between 32.7 and 63.6 percent of the amounts they are owed.
After filing for protection, the company listed assets of $459.8 million and debt of $376 million, Bloomberg reports. Throughout the auction and bankruptcy process, the company faced a great deal of skepticism for its sale to a foreign entity, particularly after receiving a federal grant of roughly $249.1 million from the U.S. Department of Energy. Wanxiang Group, which is China’s largest auto parts maker, purchased the green company’s automotive, grid, and commercial business assets for $256.6 million.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
BESS Safety and Emergency Response: Legal Issues for Developers and Property Owners
As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.