
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 31, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFailed battery maker A123 Systems wins final bankruptcy approval and will be permitted to move forward with its reorganization plan, a U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Carey approved the company’s plan to exit bankruptcy after using the proceeds from its asset sales to repay its creditors. The battery manufacturer, now named B456 Systems, faced several disputes from creditors that inhibited it from formerly emerging from bankruptcy, including a bitter disagreement between its official creditors committee and auto parts maker Johnson Controls Inc., which lost a bid to acquire the company. Instead, the company was sold to Chinese auto parts manufacturer Wanxiang Group Corp. for roughly $257 million.
Following the sale, the creditors committee accused Johnson Controls of trying to undermine the sale after losing the bid. The latter agreed to pay a settlement of $200,000 to A123 Systems’ bankruptcy estate, and the committee agreed to drop future claims against it. The settlement largely paved the way for the former battery maker to emerge from proceedings.
The company is expected to exit bankruptcy in roughly three to four weeks, and representatives said they are “thrilled with the result,” according to Bloomberg. While court documents have not yet disclosed firm financial figures, creditors are expected to recover between 32.7 and 63.6 percent of the amounts they are owed.
After filing for protection, the company listed assets of $459.8 million and debt of $376 million, Bloomberg reports. Throughout the auction and bankruptcy process, the company faced a great deal of skepticism for its sale to a foreign entity, particularly after receiving a federal grant of roughly $249.1 million from the U.S. Department of Energy. Wanxiang Group, which is China’s largest auto parts maker, purchased the green company’s automotive, grid, and commercial business assets for $256.6 million.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!