
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 31, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFailed battery maker A123 Systems wins final bankruptcy approval and will be permitted to move forward with its reorganization plan, a U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Carey approved the company’s plan to exit bankruptcy after using the proceeds from its asset sales to repay its creditors. The battery manufacturer, now named B456 Systems, faced several disputes from creditors that inhibited it from formerly emerging from bankruptcy, including a bitter disagreement between its official creditors committee and auto parts maker Johnson Controls Inc., which lost a bid to acquire the company. Instead, the company was sold to Chinese auto parts manufacturer Wanxiang Group Corp. for roughly $257 million.
Following the sale, the creditors committee accused Johnson Controls of trying to undermine the sale after losing the bid. The latter agreed to pay a settlement of $200,000 to A123 Systems’ bankruptcy estate, and the committee agreed to drop future claims against it. The settlement largely paved the way for the former battery maker to emerge from proceedings.
The company is expected to exit bankruptcy in roughly three to four weeks, and representatives said they are “thrilled with the result,” according to Bloomberg. While court documents have not yet disclosed firm financial figures, creditors are expected to recover between 32.7 and 63.6 percent of the amounts they are owed.
After filing for protection, the company listed assets of $459.8 million and debt of $376 million, Bloomberg reports. Throughout the auction and bankruptcy process, the company faced a great deal of skepticism for its sale to a foreign entity, particularly after receiving a federal grant of roughly $249.1 million from the U.S. Department of Energy. Wanxiang Group, which is China’s largest auto parts maker, purchased the green company’s automotive, grid, and commercial business assets for $256.6 million.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!