
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: August 27, 2013
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe Justice Department’s unexpected antitrust lawsuit that is designed to halt the merger of US Airways and American Airlines may interfere with the final confirmation of AMR’s bankruptcy plan, a judge said in Thursday’s hearing.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane, who before this week was expected to give the final approval of AMR’s bankruptcy plan, said that he has “lingering doubts” about approving the company’s proposal while the merger was being challenged. Instead, he requested that attorneys for the airlines submit written briefs detailing the impact of the antitrust lawsuit before he proceeded with the plan-confirmation hearing. The request may further delay AMR’s plan to formally exit bankruptcy protection, a key condition that must be met before any merger could take place. Attorneys for the airline said that the lawsuit should not stop the court from approving AMR’s bankruptcy plan, The Associated Press reports.
Earlier, representatives for the Justice Department argued that AMR is “fully capable of emerging from bankruptcy proceedings on its own with a competitive cost structure, profitable existing business, and plans for growth,” according to Bloomberg. Further, the government agency said that the merger would hinder competition in the industry and prompt the airline to raise prices and fees for consumers. Both airlines have argued that the opposite is true, and that greater resources would allow it to offer competitive pricing to customers.
Should the merger deal be blocked, analysts say that the company and its creditors will be required to establish a new plan that suits all parties, a process that could drag out into 2014. However, AMR noted that the merger is in the best interest of the company, its creditors, shareholders, and customers. Immediately following the announcement of the Justice Department’s lawsuit, representatives for both airlines said they plan to fight the litigation to move forward with their plans.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Justice Department’s unexpected antitrust lawsuit that is designed to halt the merger of US Airways and American Airlines may interfere with the final confirmation of AMR’s bankruptcy plan, a judge said in Thursday’s hearing.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane, who before this week was expected to give the final approval of AMR’s bankruptcy plan, said that he has “lingering doubts” about approving the company’s proposal while the merger was being challenged. Instead, he requested that attorneys for the airlines submit written briefs detailing the impact of the antitrust lawsuit before he proceeded with the plan-confirmation hearing. The request may further delay AMR’s plan to formally exit bankruptcy protection, a key condition that must be met before any merger could take place. Attorneys for the airline said that the lawsuit should not stop the court from approving AMR’s bankruptcy plan, The Associated Press reports.
Earlier, representatives for the Justice Department argued that AMR is “fully capable of emerging from bankruptcy proceedings on its own with a competitive cost structure, profitable existing business, and plans for growth,” according to Bloomberg. Further, the government agency said that the merger would hinder competition in the industry and prompt the airline to raise prices and fees for consumers. Both airlines have argued that the opposite is true, and that greater resources would allow it to offer competitive pricing to customers.
Should the merger deal be blocked, analysts say that the company and its creditors will be required to establish a new plan that suits all parties, a process that could drag out into 2014. However, AMR noted that the merger is in the best interest of the company, its creditors, shareholders, and customers. Immediately following the announcement of the Justice Department’s lawsuit, representatives for both airlines said they plan to fight the litigation to move forward with their plans.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!