
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 25, 2015

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comBanks investigate reported fraud, such as this, usually after receiving a panicked phone call from the card owner who comes to realize that her bank account has been pirated because the next time she used the card the transaction was denied for insufficient funds in the account. Aside from reporting the fraud and hoping the bank will agree with her that it is a fraud, and reimburse her, what should the debit card owner do to protect against the problem or to resolve it satisfactorily when it occurs?
A source of the theft is often that the card owner used a bank debit card at a gas station or store where the card owner did not know the workers, or did not see the person or camera noting the personal identification information she entered at the transaction payment point. Instead of using a debit card in such situations, the use of a credit card is a better option. But, if the fraud occurs, there are ways to communicate with the bank card issuer’s fraud investigation department that will improve your chances of getting the bank’s agreement that it was fraud and being reimbursed for the theft.
After your initial call, in which you tell the investigation unit what happened, the bank provides you with an identifying number for your claim, investigates, and within days reports back to you its determination. Often, the bank’s initial investigation will be brief and will result in a denial, putting the burden on you to appeal that determination. The bank has an appeal process for that. If you make a phone request, you will be provided with a post office address of the bank’s appeals unit and instructed to send your appeal, in writing, with such evidence as you may have to support your contention that the ATM withdrawals by the thief were not authorized by you, and that your card was never out of your possession. You can gather support for your appeal to overturn the initial determination denying your claim of fraud by presenting arguments that would lead to the conclusion that the card information was pilfered, and that the card use withdrawing cash from ATM’s was not by you and was not authorized by you. It is important to verify and state that your card was never out of your possession.
Of course, it is a good idea to try to determine where the theft occurred and whether the ATM machines used for the unauthorized withdrawals had cameras in place that recorded the transactions. If the thief was dumb enough to use a cash machine that photographed users, that would be best evidence that it was not you, nor was it an authorized user, that withdrew the funds. Other evidence you could assemble to prove your point is more readily available to you: your own history with the bank. For example, if you, like many of us, have been banking with the same bank for a number of years, and you have never used a non-bank ATM, include that information in your appeal. Also, if you never made multiple withdrawals in a single day, that would be additional circumstantial evidence to support your claim. Were you in another state, or at a significant distance away from where the unauthorized withdrawals were made at the time they were made by the thief? You may have credit card receipts, work reports, a witness statement from a person with you at the time, or other proofs that you could not have been the person who made the unauthorized withdrawals.
Consider contacting someone within the bank with whom you have had personal dealings and who may have a more sympathetic ear than a distant investigator who sees you as just another case number to resolve, and with instructions to deny appeals that are close calls. Your business relationship has value to the bank, particularly if you have kept deposits, or a business account with the bank, or if you have introduced other clients to the bank; a relationship that might be imperiled or broken by treatment of your claim that you deem unreasonable or unsatisfactory. It is certainly worth mentioning in your appeal the length of the relationship you have had with the bank, the type of accounts you maintain with the bank, the size of the deposits, fees paid or other information that may show the investigator that the claim is a serious one and that the consequences of a denial of the claim may outweigh the size of the claim being denied. You should provide the claim investigator with the name of a person at the bank that knows you and can verify the value of your relationship with the bank.
And, in the event of a denial of your appeal, seek to speak to a still higher authority, as well as your local branch manager who will not want the relationship jeopardized. If all else fails, a polite but pointed letter to the office of the president of the bank may also bring a more reasoned re-look at your claim.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Running a business in New Jersey and New York means operating within one of the most legally complex environments in the country. From the moment you form your company to the day you sell it, and every contract, hire, dispute, and transaction in between, business law is present in decisions that look, on the surface, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!