
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 22, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOn Sept. 15, Baha Mar Ltd., the owner and developer of the $3.5 billion Baha Mar resort in the Bahamas, had its Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection case thrown out by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. According to the Wall Street Journal, the court dismissed the case because the judge “perceived no greater good” from it continuing in a U.S. court.
In the court’s decision, the judge asserted that the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing for Baha Mar Ltd. fell outside U.S. jurisdiction, according to a Travel Weekly report. The reason was that the case involved the economic interests of the Bahamas; therefore, the court felt that the decision should take place there.
The judge’s decision to dismiss the case was based on the opinion of the Bahamian Supreme Court which stated that the project’s stakeholders felt the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case should be in the Bahamas. Further, the judge felt that a consensual decision needed to be reached between Baha Mar Ltd. and its primary creditors China Construction America and the Export-Import Bank. Had there been a mutual decision to seek bankruptcy protection, the judge stated that the case would have continued and a final resolution would have been reached in the U.S.
The decision was supported by China Construction America and the Export-Import Bank of China as well as by Baha Mar’s lesser ranking creditors because they had requested a dismissal. The group argued that the case needed to be decided by a court with jurisdiction over the Bahamian government, and the U.S. Bankruptcy court does not. Therefore, the group’s request was to have the case thrown out to clear the way for bankruptcy proceedings in the Bahamian Supreme Court.
After Baha Mar Ltd. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S., the Bahamian government opposed the filing. The government argued that the case needed to be decided and resolved under Bahamian law, not in the U.S. Further, the Bahamian government stated that it would not recognize or uphold any decision made outside of the Bahamas. Then, according to a Reuters report, after months of negotiations, the government sought to have Baha Mar Ltd. removed from the Baha Mar project after it filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case against it to compel the company to liquidate its remaining assets.
However, Baha Mar Ltd. argued that Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection was the best option for the company to refinance and continue development on the project.
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge did allow the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case for Northshore Mainland Services Inc., a subsidiary of Baha Mar, to continue. According to Travel Weekly, this subsidiary is located and incorporated in Florida because it oversees all Baha Mar Ltd.’s U.S. operations.
The judge asserted that the case should serve as a guide for the two parties to resolve the bankruptcy dispute. While there are no indications of how the case will go, the judge did state that Northshore Mainland’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case will proceed throughout the bankruptcy proceedings in Bahamian Supreme Court.
Following the decision, Baha Mar Ltd. officials explained in a statement that the company will seek alternatives to resolving the debt load on the project. One of those alternatives was a restructuring proposal submitted to the Bahamian Supreme Court that called for the removal of CCA Bahamas. Baha Mar’s major creditor and general contractor, from the project. This move would wipe out the $72 million debt load owed to CCA Bahamas for work on the project. The court is set to make a ruling on the new proposal in November.
In a separate decision, the Bahamian Supreme Court appointed a trustee to oversee the Baha Mar project. This trustee was given the authority to develop an alternative to Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The court also asserted that there will be a “wind down” date established where the Bahamian government will take control of the project to oversee its completion.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
Author: George McGowan

Before buying a New Jersey rental property, an investor should verify realistic operating numbers, the property’s legal and regulatory status, lead-based paint and flood compliance, the existing leases and tenant protections, and the right ownership structure. A rental property is more than a piece of real estate; it is an operating business subject to legal, […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!