Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Are Your Vendors the Weak Link in Your Cybersecurity Defenses?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: May 26, 2021

Key Contacts

Back
Are Your Vendors the Weak Link in Your Cybersecurity Defenses?

A wide-scale cyberattack revealed how easily an entity’s IT systems can be compromised by the vulnerabilities of an entity’s software vendors and other third parties...

As the SolarWinds breach made clear, one supply chain attack can wreak havoc on thousands of organizations. The wide-scale cyberattack also revealed how easily an entity’s IT systems can be compromised by the vulnerabilities of an entity’s software vendors and other third parties. 

SolarWinds Cyber Attack

In 2020, a high-profile supply chain attack occurred against SolarWinds, a provider of network management software.  The vendor was unknowingly hit with a malware attack and the breach resulted in the malicious code being inserted into a software update, which was then transmitted to 18,000 SolarWinds customers, including the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, Microsoft, and Cisco. The code created a backdoor to the impacted entities’ information technology systems, which hackers then used to install additional malware that allowed them to spy on companies and government agencies. The hackers were undetected for months, with the breach first discovered by a cybersecurity firm that noticed its own system was compromised.

The SolarWinds Attack is the most high-profile and invasive IT software supply chain attack to date. It demonstrates how dangerous embedded malware inside a legitimate product can be. If left unchecked, it can allow hackers to access the networks of many organizations using one piece of code.

Managing Third-Party Cyber Risks

The SolarWinds attack, which has now been linked to Russian-backed hackers, resulted in numerous government investigations and hearings. Most recently, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) released its report on the cyberattack.

The NYDS Report on the SolarWinds Supply Chain Attack summarizes the SolarWinds Attack, as well as the response by NYDFS-regulated companies. It also identifies four “key cybersecurity measures” that can reduce supply chain risk.

Overall, NYDFS found that companies under its oversight responded quickly. According to the report, 94 percent of the reporting companies removed the vulnerabilities from their IT systems within three days of the SolarWinds Attack’s announcement. However, NYDFS also found that some companies were not applying patches as regularly as needed to ensure timely remediation of high-risk cyber exposure. 

Most importantly, the NYDFS identifies the following cybersecurity measures as critical practices when evaluating the risks posed by vendors and similar third parties (Third Party Service Providers):   

  • Fully assess and address third party risk. Third Party Service Provider and other vendor risk management policies and procedures should include processes for due diligence and contractual protections that will ensure the company can monitor the cybersecurity practices and overall cyber hygiene of critical vendors. Furthermore, contracts with critical vendors should include provisions requiring immediate notification (ideally to at least two persons in different roles at an organization) when a cyber event occurs that impacts — or potentially impacts — an organization’s Information Systems or any non-public information (NPI) that is maintained, processed, or accessed by the vendor.  
  • Adopt a “zero trust” approach and implement multiple layers of security. Organizations should anticipate and prepare for breaches in the supply chain by incorporating supply chain risk analysis into their requisite risk assessments and risk management programs. To do this most effectively, organizations should adopt a “zero trust” mindset and assume that (1) any software installation and (2) any Third Party Service Provider could be compromised and used as an attack vector. Access should be limited “to only what is needed” and systems should be monitored “for anomalous or malicious activity.” Organizations should have layers of security and extra protection for sensitive information so that if one layer is compromised, other controls can detect or prevent an intrusion.
  • Promptly address vulnerabilities through patch deployment, testing, and validation. Organizations should have a vulnerability management program that prioritizes the organization’s patch testing, validation processes, and deployment — including which systems to patch and in what order they should be patched. Furthermore, an organization’s patch management strategy should include performing tests of all patches to the internal system environment with defined rollback procedures if the patch creates or exposes additional vulnerabilities.
  • Address supply chain compromise in incident response plans.  An effective and tested incident response plan with detailed procedures and playbooks is crucial. Incident response plans should include the following, at a minimum, to address supply chain compromises or attacks: procedures to isolate affected systems; procedures to reset account credentials for users of all affected assets and users of assets controlled by compromised software; procedures to rebuild from backups created before the compromise; procedures to archive audit and system logs for forensic purposes; and procedures to update response plans based on lessons learned. Companies should also understand what assets reside in the environment — including their versions and configurations — and enable timely notifications when changes occur. The incident response playbook should include plans to respond to unauthorized changes.

As the NYDFS report notes, there is no silver bullet that will stop all supply chain attacks. Nonetheless, there are steps companies can take to reduce the risks posed by vendors and other third parties. We encourage all businesses to review their cyber security policies and procedures to ensure that include measures to mitigate third-party risk.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Maryam Meseha, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits post image

What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits"
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies post image

Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]

Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Link to post with title - "Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies"
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights post image

What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]

Author: Robert E. Levy

Link to post with title - "What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights"
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities post image

Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities"
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses post image

Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses"
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt? post image

When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]

Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Link to post with title - "When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!