Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Apple to Settle Class-Action Lawsuit Over Rogue App Purchases By Kids
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 15, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Apple Inc. has reportedly agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit over applications (apps) purchased through its online marketplace. Five parents sued the company after their children inadvertently made purchases in apps that purported to be free.
According to the plaintiffs’ complaint, “Apple failed to adequately disclose that third-party Game Apps, largely available for free and rated as containing content suitable for children, contained the ability to make In-App Purchases.”
Apple requires users to authenticate their accounts by entering a password prior to purchasing and/or downloading an app or buying game currency. However, up until early 2011, once the password was entered once, Apple permitted users to buy game currency for up to fifteen minutes without re-entering the password. As a result, the plaintiffs’ children racked up bills ranging from $99.99 to $338.72 at a time.
The case posed an interesting contract issue. As detailed in court documents, the plaintiffs maintained that each in-app purchase constituted a separate and voidable contract between Apple and their minor children, which could be subsequently disaffirmed by a parent or guardian on behalf of the minors. Under their theory, “a contract between Apple and minor existed each time that (1) Apple offered to sell game currency to a minor playing an app, (2) the minor accepted Apple’s offer, and (3) the transaction was supported by consideration, or payment made by the Plaintiffs.”
Meanwhile, Apple argued that the relevant contractual relationship governing the in-app purchases existed solely between Apple and plaintiffs. Citing the original Terms & Conditions signed by the plaintiffs, it contended that the purchases were not voidable. Moreover, Apple argued that the Terms & Condition specifically hold the account holder liable for any unauthorized purchases.
Since the case was settled, we will never know how the court would have ruled on these issues. Under the terms of the settlement, Apple will provide a $5 iTunes store credit to impacted customers, which could reach 23 million. In addition, class members claiming $30 or more from Apple may elect to receive a cash refund. Overall, the settlement is expected to cost Apple $100 million.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to the legal issues involved, please contact me, Christine Vanek, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Apple to Settle Class-Action Lawsuit Over Rogue App Purchases By Kids
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Apple Inc. has reportedly agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit over applications (apps) purchased through its online marketplace. Five parents sued the company after their children inadvertently made purchases in apps that purported to be free.
According to the plaintiffs’ complaint, “Apple failed to adequately disclose that third-party Game Apps, largely available for free and rated as containing content suitable for children, contained the ability to make In-App Purchases.”
Apple requires users to authenticate their accounts by entering a password prior to purchasing and/or downloading an app or buying game currency. However, up until early 2011, once the password was entered once, Apple permitted users to buy game currency for up to fifteen minutes without re-entering the password. As a result, the plaintiffs’ children racked up bills ranging from $99.99 to $338.72 at a time.
The case posed an interesting contract issue. As detailed in court documents, the plaintiffs maintained that each in-app purchase constituted a separate and voidable contract between Apple and their minor children, which could be subsequently disaffirmed by a parent or guardian on behalf of the minors. Under their theory, “a contract between Apple and minor existed each time that (1) Apple offered to sell game currency to a minor playing an app, (2) the minor accepted Apple’s offer, and (3) the transaction was supported by consideration, or payment made by the Plaintiffs.”
Meanwhile, Apple argued that the relevant contractual relationship governing the in-app purchases existed solely between Apple and plaintiffs. Citing the original Terms & Conditions signed by the plaintiffs, it contended that the purchases were not voidable. Moreover, Apple argued that the Terms & Condition specifically hold the account holder liable for any unauthorized purchases.
Since the case was settled, we will never know how the court would have ruled on these issues. Under the terms of the settlement, Apple will provide a $5 iTunes store credit to impacted customers, which could reach 23 million. In addition, class members claiming $30 or more from Apple may elect to receive a cash refund. Overall, the settlement is expected to cost Apple $100 million.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to the legal issues involved, please contact me, Christine Vanek, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.