
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comTwitter, Inc. recently announced plans for an initial public offering (IPO). The news confirms that companies are increasingly deciding it’s a good time to get into the game.
As of August 31, a total of 131 companies have filed to become public in 2013, compared with just 91 during the same time period last year. Other well-known companies that have recently disclosed IPOs include Chrysler Group LLC and Hilton Worldwide Inc.
IPOs are also providing solid returns for investors this year. According to Renaissance Capital LLC, the average return of the IPOs completed in 2013 is 36 percent. Other companies are doing even better. The value of Shutterstock Inc. stock has increased 250 percent since its IPO 11 months ago. Stemline Therapeutics Inc. has seen its shares rise 265 percent.
The resurgence of IPOs suggests that investors have moved on from the flawed Facebook IPO last year. As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, trading glitches and investor lawsuits marred that social media company’s highly anticipated initial public offering. Facebook’s shares fell from a $38 first day price to a low of $17.73 last September, but are now trading significantly higher, at more than $47 a share.
Twitter is likely hoping to generate the same buzz, but with better results. The details of the IPO are still unknown, as the company elected to take advantage of a new provision in the JOBS Act, which allows “emerging growth companies” with less than $1 billion in annual revenue to file their initial documents confidentially. However, many consider Twitter’s decision to rely on this provision as an example of the miscalculation made in enacting a provision that applies equally to a start-up (which needs the benefit of the provision) and to a billion dollar company, such as Twitter (which benefits from the provision, but does not need it).
The lesson here is that to really help create more jobs via IPOs, the number of IPOs would increase dramatically if the SEC would provide smaller issuers, such as those with revenues under $50 million seeking to raise less than $25 million, with needed relief by further easing of the requirements of the more demanding and expensive audit standards, so that small companies don’t have the same audit and reporting requirements as Twitter. Having the same lengthy regulatory review with the same audit rules apply to companies big and small, highly profitable and marginally surviving, seasoned and inexperienced, is not supporting the many business innovators and “job creators” (the smaller companies) who create far more new jobs than do the bigger companies.
While there is the already existing Regulation A exemption for offerings up to $50 million*, it has been used by only a very few companies in recent decades. This is because Regulation A offerings do not yet offer significant enough advantages over full filings with the SEC, because they still entail lengthy SEC review of an Offering Circular, and because the underwriting and after-market trading support that used to be available from numerous smaller broker-dealers have evaporated under heightened FINRA scrutiny of the smaller brokers, most of which have been acquired by larger firms or gone out of business. It is ironic how little use has been made of the Regulation A exemption. Regulators have missed the boat in failing to make $25 million and under public offerings economic and viable.
To further aggressively stimulate the creation of jobs by smaller companies, their engines need to be fed with capital, which the banks are not lending and the larger brokerages are not providing. The SEC needs to rev up the engines with a more realistic and usable Regulation A exemption, lessening the time and expense involved, and FINRA needs a way to assist smaller brokerages in reconstruction of the small offering industry that was a substantial engine of capital formation and job creation in prior decades of financial prosperity here. American IPOs were 90 percent of those completed worldwide fifteen years ago; today we are below 5 percent. While the U. S. regulations and the regulators are only a part of the reason for this decline (our regulations are far more rigorous than those of our overseas competitive exchanges), it will be important and very helpful to our economy if our regulations were made more in line with the present needs of small companies to obtain public capital, instead of the end-around practice of seeking hedge fund financing followed by reverse merger capitalizations, many of which have been fraught with problems.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
*I co-authored “When Making a Small Offering Under Regulation A,” 26 The Practical Lawyer, Nos. 2 and 3; republished in the American Law Institute-American Bar Association’s The Practical Lawyers Manual of Business Forms and Checklists.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
On January 28, 2025, the Trump Administration terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board). Gwynne Wilcox, a union side lawyer for Levy Ratner, was confirmed to the Board for an original term in 2021 and confirmed again for a successive five-year term expiring […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!