
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: July 7, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comMidway Gold Corp. suspended operations last week after failing to pay off a $63.5 million debt to the Commonwealth Bank of Australia and a $10.5 million subordinate debt to Hale Capital Partners.
The company incorporated in 1996 and shifted operations into gold mining in March 2014. Midway claimed $82.9 million in assets according to recent court documents, but has yet to produce necessary revenues, as expected production fell well short of projections.
By the end of March, construction costs exceeded $84 million. These costs, combined with the uncertainties of the company’s timeline for production, sent Midway into staggering debt. There were also investor concerns about fluctuations in gold prices, finding supplementary financing, drilling results, accuracy of gold resources and reserve estimates, rising legal fees, and exorbitant operating costs that led to the bankruptcy decision.
Compounding the company’s financial problems is the fact that Midway is incorporated in Canada, and will seek bankruptcy protection there as well.
In accordance with the company’s filing, the debtor’s proposed restructuring plan calls for Midway to sell off non-core assets and equity ownership stakes. Midway’s goal is to obtain an influx of cash flow in order to buy the time and resources needed to resume operations at the mine.
The company also stated that it will remain as a “debtor in possession” as negotiations continue. However, with the company only at the beginning of bankruptcy proceedings, there is the possibility of a quick sale, debt refinancing or the formation of a strategic partnership. These negotiations are centered around the terms of the expired waiver with its senior bondholders.
Midway executives feel that the company can maximize the value of Pan Mine, which was expected to produce at costs lower than industry average. In fact, Pan Mine was originally projected to turn a profit for Midway and its lenders, even in a saturated gold market. Therefore, the company noted that there is hope for future growth and profitability in the near future.
Furthermore, with the outlook for the Chapter 11 yet to be defined, Midway and its senior lenders intend to reach a deal that will enable the company to restart operations during the pendency of the bankruptcy case. Many of these issues will be the subject of “First Day” motions, to be made shortly into the bankruptcy.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!