
Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Fred D. Zemel
Date: October 22, 2014
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comNew Jersey is the latest state to contemplate legislation to combat patent trolls, more neutrally referred to as non-practicing entities (NPEs). Critics use the term “patent trolls” because these firms often collect patent rights solely to extract licensing fees.
As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, so-called patent trolls are at the center of a nationwide debate about how to deter the abuse of patent infringement litigation. NPEs come under scrutiny because they do not directly use the patents they own to produce goods, but rather license them to other companies that do. In some cases, patent trolls pressure smaller businesses to settle suits through the use of aggressive litigation tactics, such as sending threatening demand letters that exaggerate the strength of their claims.
The proposed bi-partisan legislation (Assembly Bill 2462) prohibits a person from making a bad faith assertion of patent infringement. The bill list several factors that a court may consider as evidence of bad faith, including, that the person, when issuing a demand letter asserting or claiming that another entity has engaged in patent infringement, does not provide the following information: the patent number; the name and address of the patent owner or owners and assignee or assignees, if any; and factual allegations concerning the specific areas in which the entity’s products, services, and technology infringe the patent or are covered by the claims in the patent. Other evidence of bad faith may include:
In addition, the measure authorizes a court, upon a showing of a reasonable likelihood that a person has made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement to require that a bond be posted, which bond shall not exceed $250,000. In addition, a court may award a successful plaintiff exemplary damages in an amount equal to $50,000 or three times the total of damages, costs, and fees, whichever is greater.
States across the country have adopted similar measures and federal legislation to curtail patent litigation abuse is currently pending before Congress. Support for patent reform has grown in recent years, particularly in light of numerous studies highlighting the impact of NPEs.
In 2012, a Lex Machina study made headlines when it revealed that so-called patent trolls filed the majority of all federal patent infringement lawsuits in the United States in 2012. More specifically, the number of lawsuits increased from 24 percent of cases filed in 2007 to 56 percent in 2012. Researchers at Boston University similarly found that these lawsuits cost tech companies more than $29.2 billion in 2011, compared to $6.7 billion in 2005.
If you have questions about this post or would like to discuss patent issues impacting your company, please contact me, Fred Zemel or call 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!