Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Will New Tax Strategy Become More Widely Adopted
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 23, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Many corporations are implementing strategies to reduce their liabilities under U.S. tax law, but as these practices come under more scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service, some analysts are questioning whether they will remain viable in the future.
For instance, the Financial Times recently highlighted a practice implemented by Google, which allowed it to funnel roughly $11.91 billion in royalty payments to a shell corporation in Bermuda in 2012, a 25 percent increase from the amount transferred in 2011. The strategy – commonly called the Dutch Sandwich – involves a company selling or licensing its foreign rights to intellectual property developed in the United States to a subsidiary in a country with lower tax rates, Bloomberg explained. In doing so, foreign profits are then attributed to that offshore subsidiary rather than the U.S., greatly reducing the company’s tax liabilities.
In the case of Google, the company lowers its overseas tax rate to roughly 5 percent, less than half the rate in already low-tax Ireland. However, the move has also sparked controversy over the practice, namely because Google earns most of its foreign income in Ireland and does not pay substantial taxes in other countries. In addition to this set-up, the company moves most of its profits from Ireland to Bermuda, choosing to route the funds through the Netherlands to avoid withholding taxes, the Times added.
It is unclear how many U.S. companies have adopted this strategy, but a number of large corporations, including Facebook, Microsoft, and Starbucks have all come under fire for their controversial tax strategies. However, many analysts argue that while they may be complex, they are currently legal under U.S. tax law. This assertion may come under dispute by the IRS, however, which has said it will take a more detailed look into corporate tax strategies.
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Washington, D.C., Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda
On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements?
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Will New Tax Strategy Become More Widely Adopted
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Many corporations are implementing strategies to reduce their liabilities under U.S. tax law, but as these practices come under more scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service, some analysts are questioning whether they will remain viable in the future.
For instance, the Financial Times recently highlighted a practice implemented by Google, which allowed it to funnel roughly $11.91 billion in royalty payments to a shell corporation in Bermuda in 2012, a 25 percent increase from the amount transferred in 2011. The strategy – commonly called the Dutch Sandwich – involves a company selling or licensing its foreign rights to intellectual property developed in the United States to a subsidiary in a country with lower tax rates, Bloomberg explained. In doing so, foreign profits are then attributed to that offshore subsidiary rather than the U.S., greatly reducing the company’s tax liabilities.
In the case of Google, the company lowers its overseas tax rate to roughly 5 percent, less than half the rate in already low-tax Ireland. However, the move has also sparked controversy over the practice, namely because Google earns most of its foreign income in Ireland and does not pay substantial taxes in other countries. In addition to this set-up, the company moves most of its profits from Ireland to Bermuda, choosing to route the funds through the Netherlands to avoid withholding taxes, the Times added.
It is unclear how many U.S. companies have adopted this strategy, but a number of large corporations, including Facebook, Microsoft, and Starbucks have all come under fire for their controversial tax strategies. However, many analysts argue that while they may be complex, they are currently legal under U.S. tax law. This assertion may come under dispute by the IRS, however, which has said it will take a more detailed look into corporate tax strategies.