
Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Fred D. Zemel
Date: November 5, 2014

Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comTechnology exists that makes credit cards much less vulnerable to fraud. However, it is still not available in the United States. The new system is known as “chip-and-PIN.” As the name suggests, it improves security by inserting a tiny chip into the card, which must be activated by a personal identification number (PIN) when scanned at the point-of-purchase. The current magnetic strip system only requires a user signature and is more readily cloned by criminals.
Card issuers and retailers in Europe have embraced chip-and-PIN technology. According to statistics from the United Kingdom Payments Administration, total losses from in-store credit card fraud decreased from 218.8 million pounds ($356.5 million) in 2004 to 98.5 million pounds ($160.5 million) in 2008. Removing the signature requirement also reduces costs for retailers.
Adoption is moving slowly in the United States, in large part because one of the primary advantages for credit card companies cannot be realized under U.S. law. In the UK, consumers are held accountable if their pin number is used to complete a disputed transaction, while the merchant holds responsibility otherwise. In this country, such liability shifts are precluded under Electronic Fund Transfer Act of 1978 and Regulation E. Many retailers are also not eager to make the switch because it requires them to purchase all new equipment.
President Obama recently took executive action to spur the adoption of chip-and-PIN technology. Under the BuySecure Initiative, chip-and-PIN cards will become the standard for federal government programs. Federal agencies that process consumer sales will also replace card terminals with those with new chip and PIN security features. President Obama also announced that several leading retailers, including Home Depot, Target, Walgreens, and Walmart, would be rolling out secure chip and PIN-compatible card terminals in 2015.
“The idea that somebody halfway around the world could run up thousands of dollars in charges in your name just because they stole your number, or because you swiped your card at the wrong place in the wrong time, that’s infuriating,” Obama said.
It will be interesting to see how the executive action impacts the stalemate on credit card security. California recently attempted to enact legislation that would require larger retailers and credit card issuers to implement the new payment system. However, the bill died in committee after facing stiff opposition from the tech and banking industries.
If you have questions about this post or would like to discuss how new credit card security laws may impact your business, please the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!