Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

What is Wire Fraud and What are the Penalties for Wire Fraud?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: April 9, 2023

Key Contacts

Back

What is Wire Fraud? Wire fraud is a federal crime that occurs when a person intentionally uses an interstate communications system to defraud someone else out of property, money or anything else of value. To be guilty of this crime, it must be proven that the individual both acted with a deliberate plan to defraud and also that they employed a device or method of interstate communication to carry out the plan. 

Interstate communication is simply communication that involves sending information from one state to another. Interstate communication devices are those that are used to send information from one state to another, such as phones, emails, and other forms of wire transmission. 

TopicDetailsImplications/Consequences
Definition of Wire FraudA federal crime where a person intentionally uses interstate communication to defraud someone out of property, money, etc.Requires proof of deliberate fraud and use of interstate communication. Victim doesn’t need to lose property for crime to occur.
Classification as a Federal CrimeWire fraud is federal if it crosses state/international borders or affects interstate/international commerce.Federal charges are filed where the fraud began or had the most impact, potentially affecting multiple states/countries.
Penalty for IndividualsConviction leads to up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 per count.Harsher punishments due to federal implications. Special implications increase severity: e.g., affecting a financial institution can lead to $1 million fine and up to 30 years in prison.
Penalty for CorporationsIf a representative defrauds using electronic communication, the corporation can be charged.Penalties: fines, restitution, imprisonment for involved individuals, asset forfeiture, business dissolution, limitations, potential civil liability.
Determinants of Actual SentenceFederal judges consider U.S. Sentencing Commission guidelines. Victims have a say during sentencing.Penalties can vary significantly, from no jail time to multiple years in prison. Legal counsel, especially with SEC regulation expertise, is crucial.
Legal RepresentationScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC offers federal criminal defense attorneys.They guide clients through the federal case complexities, protecting their rights and aiming for the best outcome.

What Classifies Wire Fraud as a Federal Crime? 

Wire fraud is deemed a federal crime if involves transmitting data or information across state or international borders or if it affected interstate or international commerce in any way. Consequently, any single case of wire fraud can impact multiple states or countries. Federal charges for wire fraud can be brought against a defendant when it is determined that the fraud has crossed state lines or U.S. borders. These charges are usually filed in the jurisdiction where the fraud was initiated or where it has had the most serious impact. 

What is the Penalty for Wire Fraud?

Because of their far-reaching implications, generally speaking, federal charges come with greater punishments than those issued on a state level. This is because the federal government has the power to bring charges against a defendant who has committed crimes in various jurisdictions, and subsequently can enforce harsher punishments that more accurately reflect the gravity of the offense. 

Under federal law, an individual who is convicted after a trial or who willingly pleads guilty to wire fraud can be sentenced to up to 20 years in prison and fined up to $250,000 for each count of wire fraud. 

Special Implications  

Wire fraud is considered an especially serious crime when it affects a financial institution or is connected to a presidentially declared disaster or emergency. In such cases, the U.S. Department of Justice often takes swift and decisive action to pursue charges of wire fraud, and if convicted, those charged could face significantly increased penalties. The “Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act” (FIRREA) permits a maximum fine of $1 million per violation and up to 30 years in prison for anyone who knowingly engages in fraudulent activity concerning a federally insured financial institution.

What is the Penalty for Wire Fraud for Corporations and Companies? 

A corporation or company can be considered to have committed wire fraud if an employee or representative of the company has used electronic communications to defraud an individual or entity out of money or property.  

The potential wire fraud penalties for a company or corporation can include fines, restitution, and prison time for any individuals responsible for these acts. Other penalties that can be imposed on the company include forfeiture of assets, dissolution of the business, and limitations on future business activities. The court can impose additional penalties as well, such as ordering the company to pay restitution to victims of fraud or requiring an internal compliance program to monitor future activities. In addition, companies can also face civil liability for wire fraud, meaning they could be sued by victims and ordered to pay damages in a civil court. 

What Determines the Actual Sentence?  

When determining the penalty for wire fraud, it ultimately comes down to the judge. Federal judges have much less leeway than their state counterparts and must consider guidelines from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. If any victims were involved, they will also be able allowed to weigh in during the sentencing hearing.  

The punishment for wire fraud can vary greatly, with some individuals receiving no jail time, even as others receive sentences of multiple years in prison. To help ensure the best outcome possible, it is advisable to consult a lawyer with experience in SEC regulations. This will guarantee that any legal advice received will, help you make informed decisions concerning your case. 

Protect Your Interests and Fight for Your Rights in the Courtroom 

At Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, we have experienced federal criminal defense attorneys who are dedicated to protecting your legal rights and achieving the best possible outcome. We can guide you through the criminal justice process and help you navigate the complexities of a federal case. Get in touch with us today for the representation you need.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!