Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 28, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFalling in line with the push for greater global collaboration to combat tax evasion, the United States and the Cayman Islands have reached a tax deal to fight violations.
The partnership – which is partially designed to encourage other low-tax and favorable tax havens to join the U.S’s anti-tax evasion legislation – means that the highly-scrutinized Cayman Islands will participate in the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act set to take effect in July 2014. More specifically, the agreement “will provide certainty to Cayman’s significant fund industry with respect to FATCA implementation,” said Robert Stack, the U.S. Treasury Department’s deputy assistant secretary for international tax affairs, according to Reuters.
The deal is a large win for the U.S.’s battle against tax evasion, as the small Caribbean destination currently has no income tax and is therefore a popular location for individuals with large investment holdings. Once the agreement between the U.S. and the Cayman Islands is signed, the latter will be required to disclose account information on all U.S. clients who hold more than $50,000 in assets in the small island. However, these thresholds may be higher for those who are married and filing jointly, the IRS noted. Failure to comply with the new tax law could result in a 30 percent withholding tax on U.S. source income, and may result in countries essentially being pushed out of U.S. markets.
The threat of these penalties may play a role in encouraging other small islands and countries who have not yet signed agreements with the U.S. to either do so, or risk being alienated from lucrative U.S. financial markets. For example, Bermuda and the British Virgin Islands have yet to forge an agreement with the U.S., and may face difficulties competing for investment funds with other countries that have entered into an international partnership, Reuters explained.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!