Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Overturning Section 3 of DOMA, Creates Issues for Benefit Plans

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: July 23, 2013

Key Contacts

Back

Historically, the definition and regulation of the marriage relationship was deemed to be the exclusive domain of the states. With passage of the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (“DOMA”), Congress changed this assumption in two important respects:

  • DOMA Section 2 permitted states to refuse to recognize same-gender marriages performed under the laws of other states; and
  • DOMA Section 3 barred same-gender married couples from being recognized as “spouses” for all purposes of Federal law.

In United States v. Windsor (Case No. 12–30, decided June 26, 2013), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that DOMA’s definition of “spouse” (DOMA Section 3) is unconstitutional “as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment.”

There are many federal statutes that either confer separate or unique benefits, or impose separate or unique obligations, on married individuals. More important examples of such federal statutes include the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).  Benefit plan sponsors and administrators should immediately undertake a comprehensive review of administrative practices ‒ and plan documents ‒ to bring benefit plan practices and provisions into conformity with this decision.

Applying the Windsor decision becomes complicated because the Supreme Court did not address DOMA Section 2, which continues to allow states to refuse to recognize same-gender marriages performed under the laws of other states. Thirteen states and the District of Columbia currently recognize same-gender marriages.  A handful of other states recognize some sort of equivalent right — e.g., civil unions. The remaining states, however, also have DOMA-like statutes that define the term “spouse” for purposes of state law as a union of one man and one woman.  Thus, the Supreme Court’s decision does not attempt to address the ramifications of conflicting state laws under which the terms “married” or “spouse” will have different meanings for purposes of each state’s law. This confused state of marital status, from state to state, will particularly complicate multi-state business operations.

So what is an employer to do?

The obvious first — and critically important — step is to review all benefit plan documents to determine how the terms “spouse” and/or “married” are currently defined. Employers, whose plans cite DOMA explicitly, will clearly need to change their plan documents. Employers with self-insured plans or individually designed retirement plans can adopt their own explicit definitions but should consider the application of state law(s), as well as the implications of discrimination issues, in framing these definitions. The eligibility of children of same-gender spouses, who now are the step children of employees for federal tax purposes, must be considered and resolved.

Changes may be required to bring plans into compliance with the new rules and/or to adjust plan design. Employers with insured plans should contact their insurance providers to discuss the interpretation of the definition of spouse under the insurer’s plan document(s).

Review enrollment processes so that same sex spouses are properly identified and accorded the proper participation rights and tax treatment.  Review and change the tax treatment of health benefits for same sex spouses. For example, employees may now cover their same sex spouse’s health care coverage on a pre-tax basis.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress post image

Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress

The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]

Author: Brian D. Spector

Link to post with title - "Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress"
Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them post image

Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them

Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them"
President Trump's Termination of Member Gwynne Wilcox post image

President Trump's Termination of Member Gwynne Wilcox

On January 28, 2025, the Trump Administration terminated Gwynne Wilcox from her position as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board). Gwynne Wilcox, a union side lawyer for Levy Ratner, was confirmed to the Board for an original term in 2021 and confirmed again for a successive five-year term expiring […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "President Trump's Termination of Member Gwynne Wilcox"
How to Dissolve a Corporation in New Jersey: A Step-by-Step Guide post image

How to Dissolve a Corporation in New Jersey: A Step-by-Step Guide

Closing your business can be a difficult and challenging task. For corporations, the process includes formal approval of the dissolution, winding up operations, resolving tax liabilities, and filing all required paperwork. Whether you need to understand how to dissolve a corporation in New York or New Jersey, it’s imperative to take all of the proper […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "How to Dissolve a Corporation in New Jersey: A Step-by-Step Guide"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!