Syncora Holdings, one of the holdout creditors in the Detroit bankruptcy filing, could face sanctions for its conduct in the case.
Judge Steven Rhodes must decide this week whether he will sanction the company or allow its objection to the so-called “grand bargain,” which is crucial to the city’s restructuring plan, according to WXYZ. Syncora is a bond insurer, and stands to lose hundreds of millions in the bankruptcy.
Syncora lawyers stated that the mediators in the Detroit bankruptcy gave “naked favoritism” to the city’s pensioners and the Detroit Institute of Arts over them and other financial creditors, according to the news source. The grand bargain spins off the DIA into its own separate entity. In exchange, interested parties will give $816 million to soften pension cuts for fire, police and civil retirees in the city.
In their filing, Syncora attorneys said that the grand bargain was, “the product of agenda-driven, conflicted mediators who colluded with certain interested parties to benefit select favored creditors to the gross detriment of disfavored creditors and, remarkably, the city itself,” according to The Detroit Free Press.
Experts watching the case expressed surprise that Syncora made public allegations that mediators are violating judicial codes of conduct and conspiring to achieve politically motivated goals, the news source explained. These are serious charges, and as a result, the creditors lawyers could face fines or other sanctions should Rhodes determine that the team is attempting to “sandbag” the deal.
Syncora’s interest in the Chapter 9 bankruptcy stems from a deal that it and fellow bond insurer Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. made with the city in 2005, The Free Press explained. The companies guaranteed payments on a $1.4 billion debt deal under Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, in which the city attempted to eliminate its unfunded pension liabilities. Detroit now argues that the deal was illegal and should be discarded.
As a creditors’ rights and bankruptcy attorney, I have written about Detroit’s bankruptcy. If you want to get the full story of the current state of Motor City. Check out some of my previous posts:
Panel of Federal Judges Halts Appeals In Detroit Bankruptcy Case
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
