Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Supreme Court to Determine Whether Severance Pay is Taxable
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 18, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to explore whether companies and employees must pay Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes on severance compensation. The results of the ruling could force the U.S. Department of Treasury to pay out roughly $1 billion in tax refund claims.
The case centers around a dispute between bankrupt Quality Stores Inc. and the Internal Revenue Service. The company, which went under in 2001 and closed all 300 of its stores, was forced to lay off 3,100 workers. However, Quality Stores made severance payments to each laid-off worker and paid FICA taxes on the amounts. In 2002, the company claimed a $1.1 million refund with the IRS for the taxes paid, arguing that severance payments do not count as wages, and are therefore not subject to payroll taxes.
Employers and employees each pay 6.2 percent in Social Security taxes on wages, and some of the refund money – if awarded – will go to employees, who allowed the company to lobby for the funds on their behalf. The IRS disagreed with the claims and refused to distribute refunds. “The severance payments at issue here are clearly ‘wages’ for FICA purposes,” the government said in an August filing, according to Reuters. The tax law case is particularly important, as Americans continue to be laid off and may be unsure of their tax obligations when it comes to severance, paid-out PTO days, and bonuses. The IRS currently defines wages broadly to include compensation for services of any type for FICA tax purposes, Bloomberg notes.
Therefore, if the Supreme Court chooses to place restrictions on this law, the Treasury Department may face a barrage of refund claims from companies and employees who previously made FICA payments on severance packages after being laid off.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs
When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments
New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.