Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Supreme Court to Determine Whether Severance Pay is Taxable
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 18, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to explore whether companies and employees must pay Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes on severance compensation. The results of the ruling could force the U.S. Department of Treasury to pay out roughly $1 billion in tax refund claims.
The case centers around a dispute between bankrupt Quality Stores Inc. and the Internal Revenue Service. The company, which went under in 2001 and closed all 300 of its stores, was forced to lay off 3,100 workers. However, Quality Stores made severance payments to each laid-off worker and paid FICA taxes on the amounts. In 2002, the company claimed a $1.1 million refund with the IRS for the taxes paid, arguing that severance payments do not count as wages, and are therefore not subject to payroll taxes.
Employers and employees each pay 6.2 percent in Social Security taxes on wages, and some of the refund money – if awarded – will go to employees, who allowed the company to lobby for the funds on their behalf. The IRS disagreed with the claims and refused to distribute refunds. “The severance payments at issue here are clearly ‘wages’ for FICA purposes,” the government said in an August filing, according to Reuters. The tax law case is particularly important, as Americans continue to be laid off and may be unsure of their tax obligations when it comes to severance, paid-out PTO days, and bonuses. The IRS currently defines wages broadly to include compensation for services of any type for FICA tax purposes, Bloomberg notes.
Therefore, if the Supreme Court chooses to place restrictions on this law, the Treasury Department may face a barrage of refund claims from companies and employees who previously made FICA payments on severance packages after being laid off.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
New York NDA Requirements for Businesses
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher
New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained
How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors
Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies
How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses
Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities
On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.