Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Stock Exchanges Speak Out in Favor of Secret Arbitration
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: February 27, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Delaware is one of the most popular places for corporations to incorporate, largely due to its business-friendly legal environment. However, one of the state’s lesser-known benefits is currently in legal limbo.
In 2009, Delaware created a “secret” business court, which allows for arbitrations to be conducted in private. The law specifically authorizes the Chancellor of the Delaware Chancery Court to appoint a Chancery Judge to serve as an arbitrator in business disputes involving at least $1 million. So long as both sides agree to participate, the proceedings remain entirely confidential and closed to the public. Cases do not even receive a docket number.
However, the statute creating the court was later ruled unconstitutional in Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Honorable Leo E. Strine Jr. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that arbitration amounted to a civil trial, which must be publicly accessible.
The suit pits the business industry against open government groups. While corporate interests argue that the system provides a cost-effective and efficient means to resolve complex business litigation, government transparency advocates and the media maintain that the secrecy of the proceedings interferes with rights of public access to court proceedings.
The U.S. Supreme Court may get the final say on the issue, as the state of Delaware has asked the justices to grant certiorari. The state also now has at least two high-profile supporters. Late last month, the United States’ two largest stock exchanges, NASDAQ and the NYSE Euronext, filed amicus briefs in support of the confidential arbitration proceedings.
“Amici believe that Delaware’s confidential, expedited arbitration procedure is an important and beneficial ADR process that ensures that major United States and foreign companies choose to conduct business and list securities in the United States,” the brief argues.
Given that the Supreme Court grants certiorari in such a small percentage of cases, the Third Circuit ruling could very well stand. We will be closely following the status of the appeal and will provide updates as they become available.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss how to best protect your company’s intellectual property, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Stock Exchanges Speak Out in Favor of Secret Arbitration
Author: Robert E. Levy
Delaware is one of the most popular places for corporations to incorporate, largely due to its business-friendly legal environment. However, one of the state’s lesser-known benefits is currently in legal limbo.
In 2009, Delaware created a “secret” business court, which allows for arbitrations to be conducted in private. The law specifically authorizes the Chancellor of the Delaware Chancery Court to appoint a Chancery Judge to serve as an arbitrator in business disputes involving at least $1 million. So long as both sides agree to participate, the proceedings remain entirely confidential and closed to the public. Cases do not even receive a docket number.
However, the statute creating the court was later ruled unconstitutional in Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Honorable Leo E. Strine Jr. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that arbitration amounted to a civil trial, which must be publicly accessible.
The suit pits the business industry against open government groups. While corporate interests argue that the system provides a cost-effective and efficient means to resolve complex business litigation, government transparency advocates and the media maintain that the secrecy of the proceedings interferes with rights of public access to court proceedings.
The U.S. Supreme Court may get the final say on the issue, as the state of Delaware has asked the justices to grant certiorari. The state also now has at least two high-profile supporters. Late last month, the United States’ two largest stock exchanges, NASDAQ and the NYSE Euronext, filed amicus briefs in support of the confidential arbitration proceedings.
“Amici believe that Delaware’s confidential, expedited arbitration procedure is an important and beneficial ADR process that ensures that major United States and foreign companies choose to conduct business and list securities in the United States,” the brief argues.
Given that the Supreme Court grants certiorari in such a small percentage of cases, the Third Circuit ruling could very well stand. We will be closely following the status of the appeal and will provide updates as they become available.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss how to best protect your company’s intellectual property, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.