Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Spouses Should Be Aware of 'Gift-Splitting' Criteria when Gifting Assets
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 26, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Lawmakers’ decision to both set the estate tax at $5.25 million for 2013 and increase the annual gift tax to $14,000 has been a welcomed sigh of relief for many affluent individuals and business owners. The gift tax, in particular, has historically been a key strategy Americans have used to transfer wealth to future generations and lower their taxable estate or tax liability.
Couples who file jointly have the added advantage of doubling the amount they can gift to individuals at a tax-free rate, enabling them to extend $28,000 in cash or assets to loved ones. However, when one spouse chooses to extend a gift to another person, a scenario known as “gift-splitting” should be discussed to help them avoid federal gift taxes. Gift-splitting works as follows: If an individual or their spouse makes a gift to someone else, that gift can be considered for tax purposes as having been made half by the gifter and half by his or her spouse.
However, the IRS dictates that both individuals must agree to split the gift. This means that either spouse or the couple together could make a gift of up to $28,000 to any person and not be subject to the gift tax, so long as they both agree to it. If they do, they can each can take the annual exclusion for their part of the gift. However, the tax agency also notes that if they split the gift they made, they must file a gift-tax return to show that the individual and their spouse agrees to use gift splitting. The filing requirement is the case even if half of the split gift is less than the annual exclusion.
When gifting large amounts to children or other beneficiaries and utilizing the gift-splitting rule, it may be helpful for spouses to speak with a tax professional to understand their obligations.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Sophisticated Estate Planning & Wealth Preservation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.