
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: June 3, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comIndividuals who need to seek bankruptcy protection generally have two alternatives: “wage earner” bankruptcy under Chapter 13 or liquidation under Chapter 7. There are important differences between the two. Most notably, in a Chapter 7 liquidation the debtor essentially piles their assets into a heap, turns them over to the appointed trustee and walks away with a discharge of all remaining debts. By contrast, in a Chapter 13, the debtor is required — for up to five years — to deposit all of their net disposable income into the trustee’s hands, who then distributes them to creditors.
For this reason, in a Chapter 13, the debtor’s post-bankruptcy earnings during the five-year period are considered available to fund creditor payments. By contrast, in a Chapter 7, anything that the debtor earns from the moment they have filed their bankruptcy petition stays with them and is not distributed to creditors.
An issue has arisen from the fact that many debtors elect to try Chapter 13 but ultimately prove unable to continue with the required payments. Their cases therefore convert to Chapter 7 liquidations. The lower courts have disagreed as to what happens to any excess funds that remain in the Chapter 13 trustee’s hands when a Chapter 13 is converted to a Chapter 7.
In a May 18, 2015 decision, Harris v. Viegelahn, the United States Supreme Court has definitively ruled that, to the extent that the funds in the Chapter 13 trustee’s hand came to the trustee from the debtor’s post-bankruptcy earnings, they are to be returned to the debtor should a Chapter 13 case convert to a Chapter 7.
This is not all good news, however. One must remember that Chapter 7 is specifically limited to debtors below very specific income levels. It is not generally available to anybody.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!