
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: June 3, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comIndividuals who need to seek bankruptcy protection generally have two alternatives: “wage earner” bankruptcy under Chapter 13 or liquidation under Chapter 7. There are important differences between the two. Most notably, in a Chapter 7 liquidation the debtor essentially piles their assets into a heap, turns them over to the appointed trustee and walks away with a discharge of all remaining debts. By contrast, in a Chapter 13, the debtor is required — for up to five years — to deposit all of their net disposable income into the trustee’s hands, who then distributes them to creditors.
For this reason, in a Chapter 13, the debtor’s post-bankruptcy earnings during the five-year period are considered available to fund creditor payments. By contrast, in a Chapter 7, anything that the debtor earns from the moment they have filed their bankruptcy petition stays with them and is not distributed to creditors.
An issue has arisen from the fact that many debtors elect to try Chapter 13 but ultimately prove unable to continue with the required payments. Their cases therefore convert to Chapter 7 liquidations. The lower courts have disagreed as to what happens to any excess funds that remain in the Chapter 13 trustee’s hands when a Chapter 13 is converted to a Chapter 7.
In a May 18, 2015 decision, Harris v. Viegelahn, the United States Supreme Court has definitively ruled that, to the extent that the funds in the Chapter 13 trustee’s hand came to the trustee from the debtor’s post-bankruptcy earnings, they are to be returned to the debtor should a Chapter 13 case convert to a Chapter 7.
This is not all good news, however. One must remember that Chapter 7 is specifically limited to debtors below very specific income levels. It is not generally available to anybody.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!