Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 12, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFans of Sherlock Holmes and his trusted sidekick Watson will appreciate the legal victory just scored against the former holders of these characters’ copyrights. While the denial of a copyright extension in this case isn’t controversial, the argument advanced by the Doyle estate was unique, if not particularly effective.
In a society that is very used to copyright protections, it can be difficult to understand why these protections would expire. It is important to remember that copyright protections have not always been so accepted, and that the law – which at its heart is a curb on free speech – was and is debated by some.
The goal of copyright law might be summed, “to ensure that artists are compensated for their work, while promoting the creation of art.” Examining its effectiveness to this end, a recent study conducted at Stanford University found that the introduction of copyright law to Italy under Napoleonic rule resulted in the creation of more and higher quality operas. This makes sense: Artists are more inclined to work hard when they are assured of a share of the profit from their work.
The flip side of this is that copyright protections that last a long time have a hindering effect on art. Sherlock Holmes and Watson are a part of the public experience, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has long since passed away. The expiration of copyrights allows things like this to pass into the public domain, opening the door for new interpretations and uses.
The question of “why?” copyrights expire is relatively straightforward to answer, however, the question of “when?” is considerably more complex. For works created after Jan. 1, 1978, the protections last for the life of the author, plus 70 years. This doesn’t apply to anonymous, pseudonymous or for-hire work, however – these protections last 120 years after the work’s creation or 95 years after the work’s publication, whichever comes first.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote Sherlock Holmes a long time before 1978, however, and this places the work in more complex legal territory. Under UK and Canadian common law, all of the Sherlock Holmes stories entered the public domain in 1980. However, using a peculiarity of U.S. law, surviving heir, Dame Jean Conan Doyle, was able to register a copyright on “The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes,” a collection of stories first published between 1921 and 1927.
Using this copyright, the Doyle estate has been enforcing a copyright on Sherlock Holmes generally ever since…until losing a case just this summer.
Leslie Klinger, an author who wrote a book of original Holmes fiction, sued the estate for the right to use the characters and settings without paying royalties. He argued that, while the last 10 stories written by Doyle remained under protection, the estate held no such protection on previous stories. As such, only elements added specifically in those 10 stories were protected.
Klinger won the suit and the Doyle estate appealed. Just recently, the seventh circuit court of appeals opted to uphold the ruling, despite the Doyle estate’s fascinating argument. It suggested that Doyle made the characters more “round” in the last 10 stories, allowing them to evolve and change. As such, the copyright protections should apply to these characters that were “rounded” by works under copyright protections.
“What this has to do with copyright law eludes us,” Judge Richard A Posner wrote in the court’s opinion.
I am inclined to agree – both in legal terms and on principle. Legally, the Doyle estate advanced an interesting, but non-legal argument. Accepting it would open the door to confusing and misguided copyright policy. Perhaps almost as importantly, it seems that after all this time the characters of Sherlock Holmes and Watson should be in the public domain. Copyright law is supposed to promote artistic progress, not hinder it.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!