Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Copyright Extension & 'Rounded' Characters
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 12, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Fans of Sherlock Holmes and his trusted sidekick Watson will appreciate the legal victory just scored against the former holders of these characters’ copyrights. While the denial of a copyright extension in this case isn’t controversial, the argument advanced by the Doyle estate was unique, if not particularly effective.
Why do copyrights expire?
In a society that is very used to copyright protections, it can be difficult to understand why these protections would expire. It is important to remember that copyright protections have not always been so accepted, and that the law – which at its heart is a curb on free speech – was and is debated by some.
The goal of copyright law might be summed, “to ensure that artists are compensated for their work, while promoting the creation of art.” Examining its effectiveness to this end, a recent study conducted at Stanford University found that the introduction of copyright law to Italy under Napoleonic rule resulted in the creation of more and higher quality operas. This makes sense: Artists are more inclined to work hard when they are assured of a share of the profit from their work.
The flip side of this is that copyright protections that last a long time have a hindering effect on art. Sherlock Holmes and Watson are a part of the public experience, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has long since passed away. The expiration of copyrights allows things like this to pass into the public domain, opening the door for new interpretations and uses.
When do copyrights expire?
The question of “why?” copyrights expire is relatively straightforward to answer, however, the question of “when?” is considerably more complex. For works created after Jan. 1, 1978, the protections last for the life of the author, plus 70 years. This doesn’t apply to anonymous, pseudonymous or for-hire work, however – these protections last 120 years after the work’s creation or 95 years after the work’s publication, whichever comes first.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote Sherlock Holmes a long time before 1978, however, and this places the work in more complex legal territory. Under UK and Canadian common law, all of the Sherlock Holmes stories entered the public domain in 1980. However, using a peculiarity of U.S. law, surviving heir, Dame Jean Conan Doyle, was able to register a copyright on “The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes,” a collection of stories first published between 1921 and 1927.
Using this copyright, the Doyle estate has been enforcing a copyright on Sherlock Holmes generally ever since…until losing a case just this summer.
Klinger vs. Doyle
Leslie Klinger, an author who wrote a book of original Holmes fiction, sued the estate for the right to use the characters and settings without paying royalties. He argued that, while the last 10 stories written by Doyle remained under protection, the estate held no such protection on previous stories. As such, only elements added specifically in those 10 stories were protected.
Klinger won the suit and the Doyle estate appealed. Just recently, the seventh circuit court of appeals opted to uphold the ruling, despite the Doyle estate’s fascinating argument. It suggested that Doyle made the characters more “round” in the last 10 stories, allowing them to evolve and change. As such, the copyright protections should apply to these characters that were “rounded” by works under copyright protections.
“What this has to do with copyright law eludes us,” Judge Richard A Posner wrote in the court’s opinion.
I am inclined to agree – both in legal terms and on principle. Legally, the Doyle estate advanced an interesting, but non-legal argument. Accepting it would open the door to confusing and misguided copyright policy. Perhaps almost as importantly, it seems that after all this time the characters of Sherlock Holmes and Watson should be in the public domain. Copyright law is supposed to promote artistic progress, not hinder it.
- Industries: Entertainment & Media
- Practices: Copyright
- Locations: New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Copyright Extension & 'Rounded' Characters
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Fans of Sherlock Holmes and his trusted sidekick Watson will appreciate the legal victory just scored against the former holders of these characters’ copyrights. While the denial of a copyright extension in this case isn’t controversial, the argument advanced by the Doyle estate was unique, if not particularly effective.
Why do copyrights expire?
In a society that is very used to copyright protections, it can be difficult to understand why these protections would expire. It is important to remember that copyright protections have not always been so accepted, and that the law – which at its heart is a curb on free speech – was and is debated by some.
The goal of copyright law might be summed, “to ensure that artists are compensated for their work, while promoting the creation of art.” Examining its effectiveness to this end, a recent study conducted at Stanford University found that the introduction of copyright law to Italy under Napoleonic rule resulted in the creation of more and higher quality operas. This makes sense: Artists are more inclined to work hard when they are assured of a share of the profit from their work.
The flip side of this is that copyright protections that last a long time have a hindering effect on art. Sherlock Holmes and Watson are a part of the public experience, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has long since passed away. The expiration of copyrights allows things like this to pass into the public domain, opening the door for new interpretations and uses.
When do copyrights expire?
The question of “why?” copyrights expire is relatively straightforward to answer, however, the question of “when?” is considerably more complex. For works created after Jan. 1, 1978, the protections last for the life of the author, plus 70 years. This doesn’t apply to anonymous, pseudonymous or for-hire work, however – these protections last 120 years after the work’s creation or 95 years after the work’s publication, whichever comes first.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote Sherlock Holmes a long time before 1978, however, and this places the work in more complex legal territory. Under UK and Canadian common law, all of the Sherlock Holmes stories entered the public domain in 1980. However, using a peculiarity of U.S. law, surviving heir, Dame Jean Conan Doyle, was able to register a copyright on “The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes,” a collection of stories first published between 1921 and 1927.
Using this copyright, the Doyle estate has been enforcing a copyright on Sherlock Holmes generally ever since…until losing a case just this summer.
Klinger vs. Doyle
Leslie Klinger, an author who wrote a book of original Holmes fiction, sued the estate for the right to use the characters and settings without paying royalties. He argued that, while the last 10 stories written by Doyle remained under protection, the estate held no such protection on previous stories. As such, only elements added specifically in those 10 stories were protected.
Klinger won the suit and the Doyle estate appealed. Just recently, the seventh circuit court of appeals opted to uphold the ruling, despite the Doyle estate’s fascinating argument. It suggested that Doyle made the characters more “round” in the last 10 stories, allowing them to evolve and change. As such, the copyright protections should apply to these characters that were “rounded” by works under copyright protections.
“What this has to do with copyright law eludes us,” Judge Richard A Posner wrote in the court’s opinion.
I am inclined to agree – both in legal terms and on principle. Legally, the Doyle estate advanced an interesting, but non-legal argument. Accepting it would open the door to confusing and misguided copyright policy. Perhaps almost as importantly, it seems that after all this time the characters of Sherlock Holmes and Watson should be in the public domain. Copyright law is supposed to promote artistic progress, not hinder it.