Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judge Rules Against ResCap Noteholders, Denounces Legal Tactics
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 29, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
A U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled this week that a group of ResCap noteholders are not entitled to interest that has accrued on their claims since the mortgage servicer filed for bankruptcy protection last year.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn denied claims made by junior secured noteholders for at least $350 million in post-petition interest. Glenn ruled that the collateral backing $2.2 billion in debt held by the junior secured noteholders was only worth $1.9 billion. Therefore, since their claims are undersecured, the noteholders aren’t entitled to post-petition interest, Bloomberg reported.
The court’s ruling comes ahead of next week’s hearing on ResCap’s plan to exit bankruptcy. Under the company’s proposed plan, it would pay the noteholders all of their principal and normal interest that accrued before the case was filed last year. In his 119-page ruling, Judge Glenn denounced the noteholders’ legal tactics as “unfortunate,” as they were essentially the only creditors opposing ResCap’s plan to exit bankruptcy proceedings. He also added that during the entire course of bankruptcy proceedings, the noteholders have pursued a “strategy where they contest everything and concede nothing (even when the court has questioned whether they are acting in good faith).”
“It should not be lost on anyone that the [noteholders] stand virtually alone in this case in failing to reach a consensual agreement to resolve their issues,” Judge Glenn wrote, according to Dow Jones Business News. “The result has been protracted proceedings that have burdened the estate and reduced funds available to satisfy creditor claims. That is unfortunate.”
ResCap, a subsidiary of Ally Financial, filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in May 2012 as litigation over bad mortgage securities grew. Over the course of the proceedings, the company reached agreements to sell mortgage-servicing platforms and loan portfolios through a series of bankruptcy auctions that generated $4.5 billion in proceeds.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Smart Contract Legal Issues: Drafting Agreements for Blockchain
Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Are Stay Interviews the Key to Retaining Top Talent?
Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
Why Secured Transactions Are Important
Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Don’t Cash a “Paid in Full” Check Without Understanding the Legal Implications
Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Changes to Qualified Small Business Stock Will Benefit Startup Founders and Investors
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA) significantly impacts federal taxes, credits, and deductions. A key change relating to Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) allows greater tax-free gains for investments in startups and other qualifying small businesses. Company founders and other investors should understand how the enhanced tax strategy works or risk missing […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Consolidation and Antitrust Issues in Mergers
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.