Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judge Rules Against ResCap Noteholders, Denounces Legal Tactics
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 29, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
A U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled this week that a group of ResCap noteholders are not entitled to interest that has accrued on their claims since the mortgage servicer filed for bankruptcy protection last year.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn denied claims made by junior secured noteholders for at least $350 million in post-petition interest. Glenn ruled that the collateral backing $2.2 billion in debt held by the junior secured noteholders was only worth $1.9 billion. Therefore, since their claims are undersecured, the noteholders aren’t entitled to post-petition interest, Bloomberg reported.
The court’s ruling comes ahead of next week’s hearing on ResCap’s plan to exit bankruptcy. Under the company’s proposed plan, it would pay the noteholders all of their principal and normal interest that accrued before the case was filed last year. In his 119-page ruling, Judge Glenn denounced the noteholders’ legal tactics as “unfortunate,” as they were essentially the only creditors opposing ResCap’s plan to exit bankruptcy proceedings. He also added that during the entire course of bankruptcy proceedings, the noteholders have pursued a “strategy where they contest everything and concede nothing (even when the court has questioned whether they are acting in good faith).”
“It should not be lost on anyone that the [noteholders] stand virtually alone in this case in failing to reach a consensual agreement to resolve their issues,” Judge Glenn wrote, according to Dow Jones Business News. “The result has been protracted proceedings that have burdened the estate and reduced funds available to satisfy creditor claims. That is unfortunate.”
ResCap, a subsidiary of Ally Financial, filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in May 2012 as litigation over bad mortgage securities grew. Over the course of the proceedings, the company reached agreements to sell mortgage-servicing platforms and loan portfolios through a series of bankruptcy auctions that generated $4.5 billion in proceeds.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.