Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 18, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe nonpartisan think tank is certainly not alone in supporting this reducing corporate income tax rate, as many experts have called for such a change.
The Tax Foundation touted the benefits of lowering the corporate income tax rate shortly after Pres. Barack Obama proposed an overhaul of corporate tax policy. During his State of the Union speech earlier this year, Obama outlined his plan, which would involve closing loopholes in exchange for reducing the top corporate income tax rate to 28 percent from its existing level of 35 percent.
Currently, the U.S. has the highest top corporate income tax rate of any major economy in the world. To pay for this reduction in the top rate, the proposal would eliminate many specific breaks that make it so companies in different industries can skirt taxes.
When the Obama Administration announced the proposal, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner elaborated on the policy’s intended outcome, according to U.S. News and World Report.
“We want to restore a system in which American businesses succeed or fail based on the products they make and the services they provide, not on the creativity of their tax engineers or the lobbyists they hire,” he stated, the media outlet reported.
Obama’s proposal has certainly drawn its supporters, who contend reducing the corporate income tax would make the U.S. more competitive, according to the news source. However, some favor a more comprehensive approach, preferring that the federal government opt to eliminate the corporate income tax entirely.
The Tax Foundation has delved into the outcome of scrapping this particular policy, elaborating on how it would affect both business investment and also the size of the economy. In terms of the first benefit, eliminating the corporate income tax would effectively lower the minimum threshold companies need to get an adequate return on investment from purchasing capital equipment.
By reducing this tax, lawmakers would provide companies with greater incentive to invest in new items used for production and running businesses. Providing corporations with this particular motivation could in turn generate a handful of benefits.
If companies began buying more equipment, paying for such items would help circulate money throughout the economy. In addition, it could potentially create enhanced productivity for the firms buying the items by helping their workers get more accomplished with less time and effort.
In addition, The Tax Foundation has asserted that by increasing business investment, eliminating the corporate income tax would spur job creation and push wages higher. By having this positive impact on the labor market and putting more money in people’s pockets through lower corporate income tax rates, the change would enhance federal tax revenue over the long-term.
However, this income would likely shrink in the short-term as the economy adapted to the new policy, The Tax Foundation noted. More specifically, the nonpartisan think tank estimated that scrapping the corporate income tax would cause the federal government to automatically forego $273.5 billion in corporate tax revenue, according to The Washington Examiner.
However, within a time frame of approximately 10 years, the new policy would cause payroll, income and other tax revenues to enjoy a $273.9 billion annual gain, the media outlet reported. If such an increase came to fruition, eliminating the corporate income tax would generate no loss in revenue over the long term.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher

For many New Jersey businesses, growth is a primary objective for the New Year. However, it is important to recognize that growth involves both opportunity and risk. For example, business expansion often results in complex contracts, an increased workforce, new regulatory requirements, and heightened exposure to disputes. Without proactive planning, even routine growth can lead […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!