Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 18, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe nonpartisan think tank is certainly not alone in supporting this reducing corporate income tax rate, as many experts have called for such a change.
The Tax Foundation touted the benefits of lowering the corporate income tax rate shortly after Pres. Barack Obama proposed an overhaul of corporate tax policy. During his State of the Union speech earlier this year, Obama outlined his plan, which would involve closing loopholes in exchange for reducing the top corporate income tax rate to 28 percent from its existing level of 35 percent.
Currently, the U.S. has the highest top corporate income tax rate of any major economy in the world. To pay for this reduction in the top rate, the proposal would eliminate many specific breaks that make it so companies in different industries can skirt taxes.
When the Obama Administration announced the proposal, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner elaborated on the policy’s intended outcome, according to U.S. News and World Report.
“We want to restore a system in which American businesses succeed or fail based on the products they make and the services they provide, not on the creativity of their tax engineers or the lobbyists they hire,” he stated, the media outlet reported.
Obama’s proposal has certainly drawn its supporters, who contend reducing the corporate income tax would make the U.S. more competitive, according to the news source. However, some favor a more comprehensive approach, preferring that the federal government opt to eliminate the corporate income tax entirely.
The Tax Foundation has delved into the outcome of scrapping this particular policy, elaborating on how it would affect both business investment and also the size of the economy. In terms of the first benefit, eliminating the corporate income tax would effectively lower the minimum threshold companies need to get an adequate return on investment from purchasing capital equipment.
By reducing this tax, lawmakers would provide companies with greater incentive to invest in new items used for production and running businesses. Providing corporations with this particular motivation could in turn generate a handful of benefits.
If companies began buying more equipment, paying for such items would help circulate money throughout the economy. In addition, it could potentially create enhanced productivity for the firms buying the items by helping their workers get more accomplished with less time and effort.
In addition, The Tax Foundation has asserted that by increasing business investment, eliminating the corporate income tax would spur job creation and push wages higher. By having this positive impact on the labor market and putting more money in people’s pockets through lower corporate income tax rates, the change would enhance federal tax revenue over the long-term.
However, this income would likely shrink in the short-term as the economy adapted to the new policy, The Tax Foundation noted. More specifically, the nonpartisan think tank estimated that scrapping the corporate income tax would cause the federal government to automatically forego $273.5 billion in corporate tax revenue, according to The Washington Examiner.
However, within a time frame of approximately 10 years, the new policy would cause payroll, income and other tax revenues to enjoy a $273.9 billion annual gain, the media outlet reported. If such an increase came to fruition, eliminating the corporate income tax would generate no loss in revenue over the long term.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!