Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 18, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe nonpartisan think tank is certainly not alone in supporting this reducing corporate income tax rate, as many experts have called for such a change.
The Tax Foundation touted the benefits of lowering the corporate income tax rate shortly after Pres. Barack Obama proposed an overhaul of corporate tax policy. During his State of the Union speech earlier this year, Obama outlined his plan, which would involve closing loopholes in exchange for reducing the top corporate income tax rate to 28 percent from its existing level of 35 percent.
Currently, the U.S. has the highest top corporate income tax rate of any major economy in the world. To pay for this reduction in the top rate, the proposal would eliminate many specific breaks that make it so companies in different industries can skirt taxes.
When the Obama Administration announced the proposal, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner elaborated on the policy’s intended outcome, according to U.S. News and World Report.
“We want to restore a system in which American businesses succeed or fail based on the products they make and the services they provide, not on the creativity of their tax engineers or the lobbyists they hire,” he stated, the media outlet reported.
Obama’s proposal has certainly drawn its supporters, who contend reducing the corporate income tax would make the U.S. more competitive, according to the news source. However, some favor a more comprehensive approach, preferring that the federal government opt to eliminate the corporate income tax entirely.
The Tax Foundation has delved into the outcome of scrapping this particular policy, elaborating on how it would affect both business investment and also the size of the economy. In terms of the first benefit, eliminating the corporate income tax would effectively lower the minimum threshold companies need to get an adequate return on investment from purchasing capital equipment.
By reducing this tax, lawmakers would provide companies with greater incentive to invest in new items used for production and running businesses. Providing corporations with this particular motivation could in turn generate a handful of benefits.
If companies began buying more equipment, paying for such items would help circulate money throughout the economy. In addition, it could potentially create enhanced productivity for the firms buying the items by helping their workers get more accomplished with less time and effort.
In addition, The Tax Foundation has asserted that by increasing business investment, eliminating the corporate income tax would spur job creation and push wages higher. By having this positive impact on the labor market and putting more money in people’s pockets through lower corporate income tax rates, the change would enhance federal tax revenue over the long-term.
However, this income would likely shrink in the short-term as the economy adapted to the new policy, The Tax Foundation noted. More specifically, the nonpartisan think tank estimated that scrapping the corporate income tax would cause the federal government to automatically forego $273.5 billion in corporate tax revenue, according to The Washington Examiner.
However, within a time frame of approximately 10 years, the new policy would cause payroll, income and other tax revenues to enjoy a $273.9 billion annual gain, the media outlet reported. If such an increase came to fruition, eliminating the corporate income tax would generate no loss in revenue over the long term.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan

Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!