Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
New Court Rule to Protect Personal Information in Court Filings
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 17, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Given the growing risk of identity theft, the New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA) is taking additional steps to protect personal information included in court filings.
The OCA recently announced changes to the Uniform Civil Rules of the New York Supreme and County Court, which will take effect next year. The new rules will place the onus on attorneys to omit or protect personal information from documents filed with the courts, including:
- Social security numbers (except last four digits);
- Employer identification numbers (except last four digits);
- Date of birth (except the year);
- The full name of a minor (except initials); and
- Financial account numbers, including those identifying credit/debit cards, bank accounts, investment accounts, and insurance accounts (except last four digits).
“After looking at this for years, and looking at the federal model, we feel this is an appropriate balance in a world where identity theft is so prevalent,” said David Bookstaver, a spokesman for the Unified Court System. “We really felt we had a responsibility to protect litigants’ personal information from getting into the hands of identity thieves.”
New York’s new data protection rule largely tracks Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), which restricts the inclusion of personal identifiers, such as social security numbers and financial account information, in court filings. However, the New York rule does provide exceptions for certain actions, including matrimonial and surrogate court actions as well as guardianship proceedings under Article 81 of the state’s Mental Hygiene Law.
In addition, the requirements do not apply to the last four digits of relevant account numbers in actions arising out of a consumer credit transaction if the defendant appears and denies responsibility for the account. In such cases, the plaintiff may amend the filing to include the complete account number for in camera review by the court.
The new rule is effective January 1, 2015. However, compliance will be voluntary from January 1, 2015 through February 28, 2015, and mandatory thereafter.
Do you want to know more about how you can protect personal information? Feel free to post any questions or concerns in the comment section below.
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ, New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Businesses Are Facing Financial Headwinds—A Practical Guide
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.