Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
New Court Rule to Protect Personal Information in Court Filings
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 17, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Given the growing risk of identity theft, the New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA) is taking additional steps to protect personal information included in court filings.
The OCA recently announced changes to the Uniform Civil Rules of the New York Supreme and County Court, which will take effect next year. The new rules will place the onus on attorneys to omit or protect personal information from documents filed with the courts, including:
- Social security numbers (except last four digits);
- Employer identification numbers (except last four digits);
- Date of birth (except the year);
- The full name of a minor (except initials); and
- Financial account numbers, including those identifying credit/debit cards, bank accounts, investment accounts, and insurance accounts (except last four digits).
“After looking at this for years, and looking at the federal model, we feel this is an appropriate balance in a world where identity theft is so prevalent,” said David Bookstaver, a spokesman for the Unified Court System. “We really felt we had a responsibility to protect litigants’ personal information from getting into the hands of identity thieves.”
New York’s new data protection rule largely tracks Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), which restricts the inclusion of personal identifiers, such as social security numbers and financial account information, in court filings. However, the New York rule does provide exceptions for certain actions, including matrimonial and surrogate court actions as well as guardianship proceedings under Article 81 of the state’s Mental Hygiene Law.
In addition, the requirements do not apply to the last four digits of relevant account numbers in actions arising out of a consumer credit transaction if the defendant appears and denies responsibility for the account. In such cases, the plaintiff may amend the filing to include the complete account number for in camera review by the court.
The new rule is effective January 1, 2015. However, compliance will be voluntary from January 1, 2015 through February 28, 2015, and mandatory thereafter.
Do you want to know more about how you can protect personal information? Feel free to post any questions or concerns in the comment section below.
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ, New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.