Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
New Court Rule to Protect Personal Information in Court Filings
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 17, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Given the growing risk of identity theft, the New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA) is taking additional steps to protect personal information included in court filings.
The OCA recently announced changes to the Uniform Civil Rules of the New York Supreme and County Court, which will take effect next year. The new rules will place the onus on attorneys to omit or protect personal information from documents filed with the courts, including:
- Social security numbers (except last four digits);
- Employer identification numbers (except last four digits);
- Date of birth (except the year);
- The full name of a minor (except initials); and
- Financial account numbers, including those identifying credit/debit cards, bank accounts, investment accounts, and insurance accounts (except last four digits).
“After looking at this for years, and looking at the federal model, we feel this is an appropriate balance in a world where identity theft is so prevalent,” said David Bookstaver, a spokesman for the Unified Court System. “We really felt we had a responsibility to protect litigants’ personal information from getting into the hands of identity thieves.”
New York’s new data protection rule largely tracks Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), which restricts the inclusion of personal identifiers, such as social security numbers and financial account information, in court filings. However, the New York rule does provide exceptions for certain actions, including matrimonial and surrogate court actions as well as guardianship proceedings under Article 81 of the state’s Mental Hygiene Law.
In addition, the requirements do not apply to the last four digits of relevant account numbers in actions arising out of a consumer credit transaction if the defendant appears and denies responsibility for the account. In such cases, the plaintiff may amend the filing to include the complete account number for in camera review by the court.
The new rule is effective January 1, 2015. However, compliance will be voluntary from January 1, 2015 through February 28, 2015, and mandatory thereafter.
Do you want to know more about how you can protect personal information? Feel free to post any questions or concerns in the comment section below.
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ, New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Smart Contract Legal Issues: Drafting Agreements for Blockchain
Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Are Stay Interviews the Key to Retaining Top Talent?
Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
Why Secured Transactions Are Important
Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Don’t Cash a “Paid in Full” Check Without Understanding the Legal Implications
Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Changes to Qualified Small Business Stock Will Benefit Startup Founders and Investors
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA) significantly impacts federal taxes, credits, and deductions. A key change relating to Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) allows greater tax-free gains for investments in startups and other qualifying small businesses. Company founders and other investors should understand how the enhanced tax strategy works or risk missing […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Consolidation and Antitrust Issues in Mergers
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.