
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 24, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe business website DealBook reported on November 17 that the Justice Department is considering filing civil fraud claims against Countrywide Financials former chief executive Angelo Mozillo. Countrywide was one of the prime purveyors of mortgages to people with a questionable credit history, and the federal prosecutors are alleged to be considering a lawsuit against Mozillo due to his role in Countrywide’s marketing of mortgages.
According to the DealBook article, Mozillo’s lawyers argue that such a lawsuit would merely duplicate the Securities and Exchange Commission’s prior action, which resulted in a settlement with Mozillo and other defendants requiring the payment of $67.5 million in fines and restitution. They claim that it would be unjust for two government agencies to bring similar actions several years apart.
The DealBook article quotes Columbia University professor of criminal law Daniel Richman as saying that, “settling with the S.E.C. in and of itself doesn’t necessarily guarantee peace from the government at large.” Richman also notes that Mozillo could have asked for a global settlement when he made his deal with the S.E.C. but apparently did not.
Mozillo was the public face for the excesses which led to the mortgage market meltdown, and there is persistent, public anger over the absence of any criminal prosecutions for persons responsible for the financial crisis. However, federal prosecutors around the country have used the law to obtain over $36 billion in settlements from the financial firms involved in selling defective, mortgage-backed securities.
Whether or not to sue Mozillo will require a final decision by the Justice Department in Washington, and it could become one of the first orders of business for the proposed new Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!