Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
PROSECUTORS CONSIDER CIVIL ACTION AGAINST COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIALS CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 24, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
The business website DealBook reported on November 17 that the Justice Department is considering filing civil fraud claims against Countrywide Financials former chief executive Angelo Mozillo. Countrywide was one of the prime purveyors of mortgages to people with a questionable credit history, and the federal prosecutors are alleged to be considering a lawsuit against Mozillo due to his role in Countrywide’s marketing of mortgages.
According to the DealBook article, Mozillo’s lawyers argue that such a lawsuit would merely duplicate the Securities and Exchange Commission’s prior action, which resulted in a settlement with Mozillo and other defendants requiring the payment of $67.5 million in fines and restitution. They claim that it would be unjust for two government agencies to bring similar actions several years apart.
The DealBook article quotes Columbia University professor of criminal law Daniel Richman as saying that, “settling with the S.E.C. in and of itself doesn’t necessarily guarantee peace from the government at large.” Richman also notes that Mozillo could have asked for a global settlement when he made his deal with the S.E.C. but apparently did not.
Mozillo was the public face for the excesses which led to the mortgage market meltdown, and there is persistent, public anger over the absence of any criminal prosecutions for persons responsible for the financial crisis. However, federal prosecutors around the country have used the law to obtain over $36 billion in settlements from the financial firms involved in selling defective, mortgage-backed securities.
Whether or not to sue Mozillo will require a final decision by the Justice Department in Washington, and it could become one of the first orders of business for the proposed new Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Smart Contract Legal Issues: Drafting Agreements for Blockchain
Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Are Stay Interviews the Key to Retaining Top Talent?
Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
Why Secured Transactions Are Important
Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Don’t Cash a “Paid in Full” Check Without Understanding the Legal Implications
Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Changes to Qualified Small Business Stock Will Benefit Startup Founders and Investors
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA) significantly impacts federal taxes, credits, and deductions. A key change relating to Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) allows greater tax-free gains for investments in startups and other qualifying small businesses. Company founders and other investors should understand how the enhanced tax strategy works or risk missing […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Consolidation and Antitrust Issues in Mergers
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.