
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 24, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe business website DealBook reported on November 17 that the Justice Department is considering filing civil fraud claims against Countrywide Financials former chief executive Angelo Mozillo. Countrywide was one of the prime purveyors of mortgages to people with a questionable credit history, and the federal prosecutors are alleged to be considering a lawsuit against Mozillo due to his role in Countrywide’s marketing of mortgages.
According to the DealBook article, Mozillo’s lawyers argue that such a lawsuit would merely duplicate the Securities and Exchange Commission’s prior action, which resulted in a settlement with Mozillo and other defendants requiring the payment of $67.5 million in fines and restitution. They claim that it would be unjust for two government agencies to bring similar actions several years apart.
The DealBook article quotes Columbia University professor of criminal law Daniel Richman as saying that, “settling with the S.E.C. in and of itself doesn’t necessarily guarantee peace from the government at large.” Richman also notes that Mozillo could have asked for a global settlement when he made his deal with the S.E.C. but apparently did not.
Mozillo was the public face for the excesses which led to the mortgage market meltdown, and there is persistent, public anger over the absence of any criminal prosecutions for persons responsible for the financial crisis. However, federal prosecutors around the country have used the law to obtain over $36 billion in settlements from the financial firms involved in selling defective, mortgage-backed securities.
Whether or not to sue Mozillo will require a final decision by the Justice Department in Washington, and it could become one of the first orders of business for the proposed new Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!