Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

What Investors Need to Know About Private Transfers of Unregistered Stock

Author: Dan Brecher

Date: August 14, 2018

Key Contacts

Back

In Recent Years, the Federal Government Has Eased Restrictions on Private Transfers of Unregistered Stock…

You bought stock in a private placement and the company is growing. Now you want to sell half of that stock to your neighbor or to transfer portions to your wife and children. How is this accomplished? What laws and rules apply? Where do you go for guidance?

What Investors Should Know About Private Transfers of Unregistered Stock
Photo courtesy of Chris Liverani (Unsplash.com)

These are common questions we often hear from investors. Thankfully, the federal government has eased restrictions in recent years, making the process of private transfers far less complicated than it once was.

What Is a Private Placement?

Under the federal securities laws, a company may not offer or sell securities unless the offering has been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or an exemption from registration applies. A securities offering that is exempt from registration with the SEC is often referred to as an unregistered offering or private placement offering.

Private placements differ from traditional securities offerings in several key ways. Most notably, they have restrictions on their transfer, and you will need to comply with an exemption from registration to resell. When you acquired the restricted securities, you likely received a certificate stamped with a “restrictive” legend. The legend indicates that the securities may not be resold in the marketplace unless they are registered with the SEC or are exempt from the registration requirements. 

The good news is that over the last several decades, the federal government (Congress and the SEC) have eased the previously rigid restrictions on such transfers so that these types of private transactions between friends, neighbors, business associates or family members are no longer subject to regulations that used to call for waiting years to achieve required holding periods or obtaining complex legal opinions reciting facts supporting exemptions allowing private transactions before a stated holding period ran.

The federal government determined that encouraging capital formation by young companies was important for our economy, so it eased holding period and transfer requirements over the past several decades. An earlier long-standing two year holding period was reduced to one year twenty plus years ago and is now down to six months under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933.

Privately Transferring Unregistered Securities

Today, with liberalized rules and shortened holding periods, privately transferring unregistered securities is far more easily accomplished. The liberalizations have virtually eliminated the need for the average investor to seek a no-action letter from the SEC — a letter that states that under the facts presented, the SEC would take no enforcement action against the proposed securities transfer.

Private transactions are now more readily seen by regulators as exempt under Section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act or under the SEC’s shortened Rule 144 holding periods.

Private Resale Under Section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act

Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 authorizes private placements by exempting from registration “transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering.” Meanwhile, Section 4(a)(1) exempts from registration “transactions by any person other than an issuer, underwriter, or dealer.”

Accordingly, investors who hold private placements can sell their securities in a private sale without registration if they are not considered an “underwriter.” Under section 2(a)(11), a person may qualify as an “underwriter” if he acquires securities with a view to “distribution” or is participating in a “distribution,” which generally means an offering that is not a private offering. Because it is based on a combination of Sections 4(a)(1) and 4(a)(2), the resale exemption is often referred to as “Section 4(1-1/2).”

In 2015, the FAST Act created a new exemption for certain resales of securities. While the newly-created Section 4(a)(7) of the Securities Act is largely intended to codify Section 4(1-1/2), it contains its own specific requirements. They include:

  • All purchasers must be “accredited investors”;
  • Neither the seller, nor anyone acting on the seller’s behalf, can use any general solicitation or advertising in offering or selling the securities;
  • Issuers who are not subject to SEC reporting requirements or not exempt from reporting under Rule 12g3‑2(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must provide the seller and prospective purchaser with certain disclosures;
  • Neither the seller, nor any person receiving a commission for participating in the transaction, is disqualified as a “bad actor” under Rule 506(d)(1) of Regulation D or subject to disqualification under Section 3(a)(39) of the Securities Exchange Act;
  • The issuer must be engaged in a business that is not in the organizational stage or in bankruptcy, and cannot be a blank check, blind pool or shell company;
  • The transaction cannot involve securities that are part of an unsold allotment to an underwriter; and
  • The securities to be resold must have been authorized and outstanding for at least 90 days prior to their resale.

Rule 144 Holding Periods

Rule 144 authorizes the public resale of restricted securities provided that a number of conditions are met. If you are not (and have not been for at least three months) an affiliate of the company issuing the securities and have held the restricted securities for at least one year, you can sell the securities without satisfying the conditions of Rule 144.  An affiliate is a person, such as an executive officer, a director or large shareholder, in a relationship of control with the issuer.

If the issuer of the securities is subject to the Exchange Act reporting requirements and you have held the securities for at least six months but less than one year, you may sell the securities as long as the current public information condition is satisfied. It mandates that there is adequate current information about the issuing company publicly available before the sale can be made. For reporting companies, this generally means that the companies have complied with the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For non-reporting companies, this means that certain company information, including information regarding the nature of its business, the identity of its officers and directors, and its financial statements, is publicly available.

Even if you can satisfy all the conditions of Rule 144, you must still have the legend removed from the certificate. Transfer agents can remove a restrictive legend; however, they will typically only do so if the issuer consents—usually in the form of an attorney’s opinion letter to the transfer agent. So, although transfer agents may still require a legal opinion letter to affect a private transaction, these letters have become far less difficult to obtain and require far less of an attorney’s fact review time.

Finally, state regulators remain relevant, depending upon where you reside.  Virtually all states have isolated transaction exemptions applicable to the typical investor in a private transaction. As a result, the entire process of privately transferring  your unregistered securities investments is now a “piece of cake.”

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!