Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 25, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comJoan Rivers is not always known for her tactful language and political correctness, but a recent appeals court sided with the comedian in a recent privacy lawsuit brought on by fan who attended a show that appeared in Rivers’ 2010 documentary.
The plaintiff, Ann Bogie, was filmed having a discussion with Joan Rivers during the autograph session of the show backstage, and ultimately filed suit after the 16-second clip appeared in the “Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work” documentary, arguing that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy. The documentary features a show in Wisconsin, during which the 76-year-old made a Helen Keller joke that offended an audience member, who interrupted the show to remark that his son was deaf and he found the quip offensive.
“Oh please, you are so stupid,” Rivers said. “Comedy is to make everybody laugh at everything and deal with things. You idiot.”
Backstage following the encounter, Bogie told Rivers she “had never laughed so hard in her life,” and called the heckler in the audience a “rotten guy.” When the clip appeared in the documentary, Bogie sued Rivers and said the surprise appearance in the film misappropriated her image and violated her privacy. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision that dismissed Bogie’s privacy claims and asserted that no person could have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a backstage area.
“Assuming that Bogie was invited backstage, that would not advance her claim of a reasonable expectation of privacy,” Judge David Hamilton wrote for the panel. “The film shows that any such invitation was to obtain a backstage autograph from a celebrity in the presence of several security personnel and a film crew. No reasonable person would expect privacy in that situation.”
This is not the first time audience members that have appeared in documentaries have brought privacy suits against celebrities. Several people who appeared in a number of Sacha Baron Cohen films, including Borat, sued the actor and argued that he violated several provisions of entertainment law. However, nearly all of these plaintiffs lost their lawsuits.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!