Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 25, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comJoan Rivers is not always known for her tactful language and political correctness, but a recent appeals court sided with the comedian in a recent privacy lawsuit brought on by fan who attended a show that appeared in Rivers’ 2010 documentary.
The plaintiff, Ann Bogie, was filmed having a discussion with Joan Rivers during the autograph session of the show backstage, and ultimately filed suit after the 16-second clip appeared in the “Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work” documentary, arguing that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy. The documentary features a show in Wisconsin, during which the 76-year-old made a Helen Keller joke that offended an audience member, who interrupted the show to remark that his son was deaf and he found the quip offensive.
“Oh please, you are so stupid,” Rivers said. “Comedy is to make everybody laugh at everything and deal with things. You idiot.”
Backstage following the encounter, Bogie told Rivers she “had never laughed so hard in her life,” and called the heckler in the audience a “rotten guy.” When the clip appeared in the documentary, Bogie sued Rivers and said the surprise appearance in the film misappropriated her image and violated her privacy. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision that dismissed Bogie’s privacy claims and asserted that no person could have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a backstage area.
“Assuming that Bogie was invited backstage, that would not advance her claim of a reasonable expectation of privacy,” Judge David Hamilton wrote for the panel. “The film shows that any such invitation was to obtain a backstage autograph from a celebrity in the presence of several security personnel and a film crew. No reasonable person would expect privacy in that situation.”
This is not the first time audience members that have appeared in documentaries have brought privacy suits against celebrities. Several people who appeared in a number of Sacha Baron Cohen films, including Borat, sued the actor and argued that he violated several provisions of entertainment law. However, nearly all of these plaintiffs lost their lawsuits.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!