Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 15, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comRobert and William Pohlad, sons of late Minnesota Twins owner Carl Pohlad, who passed away in 2009, have brought a lawsuit against IRS regarding a disputed $189 million tax bill.
The IRS recently imposed the multi million-dollar tax liability on the heirs, arguing that Pohlad’s estate undervalued his stake in the Minnesota Twins, according to Forbes. In the lawsuit filed in the U.S. Tax Court, Pohlad’s estate valued the late owner’s stake in the Minnesota Twins at $24 million for tax purposes. However, IRS auditors disputed these figures and valued his stake at approximately $293 million. In response, the IRS tacked on $121 in additional taxes, and imposed a 40 percent penalty for “gross valuation misstatement” that amounts to an added $48 million, Forbes reports.
Further, after scrutinizing a series of wealth transfer methods Pohlad utilized to pass assets on to his heirs, the IRS also claims that he undervalued the gifts he made to beneficiaries. Pohlad made full use of the gift tax law when passing considerable wealth to heirs, and stated that the gifts he transferred amounted to $129 million. However, auditors later argued that Pohlad made $446 in taxable gifts.
Pohlad’s sons are the executors of his estate, and assert that all estate and gift taxes have been paid to the IRS. In the lawsuit, the estate asserted that it paid the $16 million in gift taxes and $26 million in estate taxes.
Several high-profile estate tax cases between the IRS and late sports team owners are currently ongoing, the most recent of which is a lawsuit waged by the estate of Detroit Pistons’ former owner Bill Davidson, who received a $1.9 billion tax bill from the IRS. In some ways similar to the Pohlad case, the IRS charges that Davidson undervalued millions in private stock that was passed down to heirs. The estate, meanwhile, asserts that all estate and gift taxes paid to the agency were accurate.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher

For many New Jersey businesses, growth is a primary objective for the New Year. However, it is important to recognize that growth involves both opportunity and risk. For example, business expansion often results in complex contracts, an increased workforce, new regulatory requirements, and heightened exposure to disputes. Without proactive planning, even routine growth can lead […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!