
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 24, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comIn July 2013, the city of Detroit filed the largest case under Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy laws in the history of the United States. The case didn’t sit well with everyone. The administrators of the city’s pension funds have been steadfastly opposed to the bankruptcy, asserting that it put at risk the money of hard-working employees.
However, in a recent three-and-a-half hour discussion led by U.S. Chief District Judge Gerald Rosen, it appears as though a bargain has been reached to make all sides happy. According to the Detroit Free Press, Rosen announced that nine foundations had pledged $330 million which the debtor will be able to use to help keep the city’s pension funds liquid. This will be a positive step in Detroit’s struggle to restructure its municipal debt.
The funds are coming from supporters of the Detroit Institute of Arts, who are pledging the money so that the city can avoid having to put its extensive holdings, including Picassos and Van Goghs, up for auction to pay its debts. The plan is to have the money go to help retiree pensions, which otherwise might be underfunded by as much as $3.5 billion, according to Bloomberg.
“Today’s announcement offers hope that by working collaboratively, the city, its creditors and labor stakeholders can reach a negotiated solution that will resolve all claims and improve the services that are admittedly and critically necessary,” Kevyn Orr, the city’s emergency financial manager, told Bloomberg.
Orr added that the $330 million raised by donors is less than the $500 million he had hoped would be received, but it should be a step in the right direction to help reduce opposition to Detroit’s bankruptcy, and keep the proceedings moving forward. After the proposal was first reported, more donations came in, which could help reach the $500 million goal.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!