Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
No Pension Cuts For Detroit's Uniformed Retirees
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: April 29, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
One of the biggest obstacles to the successful resolution of the Detroit bankruptcy filing so far has been opposition from pensioners, who represent a significant portion of the city’s debt.
In an unexpected announcement April 15, Gerald Rosen, Detroit’s bankruptcy mediator, revealed that the city has reached a deal with the Retired Detroit Police and Fire Fighters Association, in which pensioners will receive almost no cuts in monthly pension checks and would keep “almost half” of annual cost-of-living adjustments, according to the Detroit Free Press. This latest agreement, which comes on the heels of separate deals with two global banks and unsecured bondholders, could help the city to emerge sooner from bankruptcy than expected.
The Association also agreed to support the creation of a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association, which would manage retiree health care, according to USA Today. The retiree association agreed to support the city’s restructuring proposal on the condition that Michigan contributes the $350 million that it has promised as part of the “grand bargain” to protect the Detroit Institute of Art. The deal requires retirees and active vested pensioners to vote individually as to whether they will relinquish their right to pursue lawsuits over pension cuts against the state of Michigan. For any deal to receive enough support to pass, it will need the retirement systems and the Official Committee of Retirees to recommend a “yes” vote to pensioners.
Detroit police retiree Mustafa Abdur-Rahman, 52, told the Free Press that he’s ready to agree to the deal.
“I’d say I’m thrilled about it,” Abdur-Rahman, who receives a monthly check of about $3,500, told the news source. “If I know what I’m working with up front, I can adjust what I’m doing. It’s like a Social Security check: I’ve never heard them cutting a Social Security check, but if they’re going to cut the cost of living, I can take that.”
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.