The issue of corporate taxation has taken center stage in many policy-makers’ minds across the world, yet difficulties in agreeing on a solution seem to have resulted in an effective “paralysis.”
According to PwC and OECD data cited by The Economist, the global average corporate income tax as a share of profits is continuing to drop precipitously. From an average of over 19 percent in 2004, the figure had dropped to roughly 16.5 percent by 2012. As a percent of GDP, the average revenues from corporate income tax for the OECD rose to a high of just over 3.5 percent in 2006 before falling in the recession to approximately 2.25 percent. This figure did recover by 2012 to just below its 2004 level of about 2.8 percent.
In response, the 2012 G20 called on the OECD to find consensus as to how to close the loopholes in international tax standards that multinationals exploit to lower their bills, according to the news source. After two years, the OECD presented its plan to the 2014 G20 on Sept. 20 for approval, which it received.
The proposal attempts to curb a number of practices and is to be followed by a second part next year. Practices that would be banned or curbed include “transfer pricing,” by which multinationals shift profits to low-tax countries by charging fees between different subsidiaries they own, and “hybrid mismatching,” which allows companies to claim double deductions by classifying financial instruments as debt in one country and equity in another. Additionally, it would allow member countries to share information about multinationals’ assets, sales, profits, etc among other measures.
Unfortunately, the next stage is genuinely much harder, according to The Guardian. Agreeing to a measure at the G20 is one thing – expecting every OECD country to embed the measures into the more than 3,000 tax treaties of global trade is quite another. Clearly, many countries are dedicated to ending the “race to the bottom” that has characterized global corporate tax policy issues over the last several years, but the current measure should be considered with some skepticism.
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
