Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 29, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe New Jersey Attorney General’s Office and the State Police published recently the state’s first annual data breach report. It revealed that more than 116,000 New Jersey residents fell victim to 676 data breaches reported in 2016.

“Doing business online and on our devices has become so routine that it’s easy to let our guard down. But as these statistics on data breaches highlight, it’s critical that we protect our sensitive personal information from the many who seek to access it for harmful ends,” Attorney General Christopher Porrino said in a press statement.
In 2015, Gov. Chris Christie established the New Jersey Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Cell (NJCCIC), which serves as the state’s central hub for cybersecurity information sharing, threat analysis, and incident reporting. The goal of the central agency is to reduce New Jersey’s cyber risk and respond to emergent incidents through collaborations between local, state, federal, public, and private sector institutions.
Businesses can subscribe to cyber alerts via the NJCCIC website, as well as report data breaches. Under New Jersey’s Identity Theft Prevention Act, any business that operates in New Jersey or any public entity that compiles or maintains computerized records that include personal information must report a breach of security to the State Police and notify affected individuals who are New Jersey residents and whose personal information was or believed to have been accessed by an unauthorized person.
The Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC) defines a data breach to include an incident in which an individual name plus a Social Security number, driver’s license number, medical record or financial record (credit/debit cards included) is potentially put at risk because of exposure. This exposure can occur either electronically or in paper format. The ITRC also tracks breaches that do not trigger data breach notification obligations. Generally, non-reportable breaches may consist of exposure of user names, emails and passwords that do not fall within New Jersey’s definition of sensitive personal identifying information. These breach incidents are included by name but without the total number of compromised records included in the cumulative total. Importantly, other states have broader definitions of sensitive personal identifying information, which may include email addresses and passwords that may trigger the obligation to report the breach. Thus, any breach involving personal information of residents of other states requires a careful analysis of each state’s data breach notification laws to ensure compliance.
The NJCCIC currently tracks seven categories of data loss methods:
The NJCCIC also tracks various types of information compromised:
According to the report released, the finance/banking industry saw the most data breaches in 2016. Other business sectors most often involved with breaches were health services, business services, and retail trade. Other industries highlighted included education, restaurant, industrial/manufacturing, hotels, non-profits, non-medical insurance, and telecommunications, among others.
Data loss was most frequently attributed to phishing and hacking. Website malware, employee incident, unauthorized email access and ransomware were also utilized to target New Jersey businesses and residents.
The NJ Attorney General also highlighted legal actions taken in 2017 by the Division of Law and the Division of Consumer Affairs to address data breaches. They included:
The single most important thing you can do to address a cyber breach or threat is contact immediately a team of professionals, led by an experienced lawyer knowledgeable in breach response.
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below for Fernando M. Pinguelo. If you have any questions about this post, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouse Watch – Where Technology, Politics, and Privacy Collide (http://ewhwblog.com).
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!