Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 25, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn addition to reducing corporate income tax rates, the proposal would simplify the method used to calculate their tax liability and provide incentives for manufacturers to invest in the Tar Heel State.
The Senate is considering this legislation after the administration of Gov. Pat McCrory (R-Georgia) floated a proposal that was mostly approved by the House earlier this month, according to The Associated Press.
Sen. Phil Berger, (R-Rockingham) leader of this legislative body, sponsored the Senate’s version of the plan. Berger, along with other senators in his party, failed to provide the governor’s proposal with a warm reception, the media outlet reported. The governor’s version focuses almost entirely on specific economic incentive programs, and senate republicans are somewhat doubtful of these initiatives.
Berger offered his own version of the economic development program, asserting his rendition “answers the governor’s call for economic development funds while improving the tax climate for all North Carolina businesses,” according to the news source.
The bill Berger introduced contains several major components:
1) Corporate income tax cut: The bill would the cut the Tar Heel State’s corporate income tax to 4 percent at the start of 2016 and then to 3 percent during the beginning of 2017. North Carolina’s rate has fallen to 5 percent from 6.9 percent since 2013, but the proposed reduction would provide it with the lowest corporate income tax rate in the Southeast.
2) Simplifying corporate taxes: The proposal would tax companies based on the goods and services they sell in North Carolina. If businesses don’t make these transactions in the Tar Heel State, they would not generate liability. Currently, many states that are close by, including Virginia, South Carolina and Georgia, leverage a similar method.
If North Carolina can transition to using a single sales factor, it can help provide enhanced incentives for companies looking to manufacture goods in the state and sell the bulk of these items elsewhere, according to The Associated Press. Such a development could help bolster investment in the Tar Heel State, motivating companies to purchase property and hire workers.
3) Enhance The Job Development Investment Grant: The recently introduced bill aims to upgrade an existing program providing grants to companies based on the amount of withholding taxes they pay for their employees.
By doing so, the legislation intends to make it easier for North Carolina to draw major manufacturing projects that commit to hiring at least 2,500 workers in the state and investing at least $1 billion.
While JDIG currently provides a large portion of these funds to a handful of counties, the proposal would ensure that other jurisdictions receive the majority of these resources going forward, according to The News & Observer.
In 2014, nearly 90 percent of the JDIG funds allocated for all of North Carolina went to Durham, Wake and Mecklenburg, which have a median annual income nearing $57,000.
The economic stimulus package would come along with restrictions to ensure that funds would last longer and be dispensed in a responsible manner. While the JDIG disburses these funds on an annual basis, the proposal would distribute these grants every quarter.
In addition, the legislation would ensure that most of the grant money associated with the program would go to the state’s remaining 97 counties, which have a median income of slightly more than $40,000.
Berger touted the benefits of the bill he introduced in the Senate, emphasizing its ability to streamline economic policy and produce job growth.
“This balanced plan will not only help North Carolina attract new jobs, but will also provide a real boost to the job-creators already making a valuable investment in our state’s economy – instead of simply asking them to pay for new businesses to move here,” he said in a statement. “By equipping Gov. McCrory with stronger tools to recruit major manufacturers, helping level the playing field for allocating economic development funds and providing much-needed tax relief, we will empower the entire state to grow and prosper.”
On top this proposal, Sen. Rick Gunn (R-Alamance) introduced an additional bill that would empower the General Assembly by allocating another $5 million to the JDIG for the rest of 2015. With these resources, the assembly could work toward revising economic development programs that will affect the state in its entirety.
McRory quickly criticized the proposal, asserting that it would deprive the state of too much tax revenue, according to The News & Observer. In addition, he claimed the Senate version of the economic development plan was “in strong disagreement” with the ideas put forth by his administration.
He continues to warn that if North Carolina doesn’t provide its main incentives fund with more financial resources soon, companies will consider doing business in other states, the media outlet reported.
Amid these concerns, the matter of how many companies should fall under the single sales factor policy has generated a wide range of views, according to the news source. The House version of the bill would only let companies investing more than $1 billion in the Tar Heel State – most likely manufacturers – benefit from this particular tax treatment.
While lawmakers refused to provide exact figures on how much it would cost to implement Berger’s single sales factor tax, Commerce Secretary John Skvarla told members of the media March 17 that the state could not afford to adopt this particular policy, WRAL.com reported.
However, the Senate leader provided an opposing view, according to the news source.
“I would say we could not afford not to do it,” Berger stated, emphasizing that many other states in the Southeast are harnessing the policy to incentivize companies, the media outlet reported.
Considering the sharp differences of opinion, it is safe to say that lawmakers may be in for some intense discussions as to how they should best address economic challenges in the Tar Heel State.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!