Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Brian McNamee's Defamation Lawsuit Involves Steroids
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 7, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Steroids in baseball has been a major topic of conversation for quite some time.
Former New York Yankee and Boston Red Sox pitcher, Roger Clemens, was one of the most recent targets, as his trainer, Brian McNamee, said he provided Clemens with performance-enhancing drugs.
PEDs have led to numerous legal battles, but one of the cases still going on has nothing to do with the legality of steroids in baseball. After being accused by McNamee, Clemens attempted to discredit him as a source of this information which McNamee claims led to defamation. It appears as though this case could be headed to trial soon.
McNamee has to prove the following four elements in order to get a ruling in his favor for defamation:
1. The defamatory statement must be published. This means it can be spoken, written, pictured or gestured. Written statements are often considered more serious by courts, as these last longer than the spoken word.
2. In addition to being published, the statement must also be false. Someone can speak something that is mean or disparaging, but if it is true it isn’t defamatory. Generally, opinions don’t count as defamation because it is difficult to prove if such statements are objectively false. For example, Clemens calling McNamee the worst trainer of all time isn’t a defamatory statement.
3. The third element that must be proven is that the statement was “injurious.” Defamation lawsuits are filed to repair a reputation, which means a statement needs to actually hurt someone’s image.
4. The final element is that the statement is “unprivileged.” This means that people who testify in court falsely can not be sued for defamation. Privileged statements are those when free speech is important enough that people should not have to worry about being sued for defamation.
The Clemens vs. McNamee legal battle has been going on for quite some time. It will be interesting to see if it ends up going to trial – and if McNamee wins – as defamation is not any easy thing to prove, shown by the four aforementioned elements.
- Industries: Entertainment & Media
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.