Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Brian McNamee's Defamation Lawsuit Involves Steroids
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 7, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Steroids in baseball has been a major topic of conversation for quite some time.
Former New York Yankee and Boston Red Sox pitcher, Roger Clemens, was one of the most recent targets, as his trainer, Brian McNamee, said he provided Clemens with performance-enhancing drugs.
PEDs have led to numerous legal battles, but one of the cases still going on has nothing to do with the legality of steroids in baseball. After being accused by McNamee, Clemens attempted to discredit him as a source of this information which McNamee claims led to defamation. It appears as though this case could be headed to trial soon.
McNamee has to prove the following four elements in order to get a ruling in his favor for defamation:
1. The defamatory statement must be published. This means it can be spoken, written, pictured or gestured. Written statements are often considered more serious by courts, as these last longer than the spoken word.
2. In addition to being published, the statement must also be false. Someone can speak something that is mean or disparaging, but if it is true it isn’t defamatory. Generally, opinions don’t count as defamation because it is difficult to prove if such statements are objectively false. For example, Clemens calling McNamee the worst trainer of all time isn’t a defamatory statement.
3. The third element that must be proven is that the statement was “injurious.” Defamation lawsuits are filed to repair a reputation, which means a statement needs to actually hurt someone’s image.
4. The final element is that the statement is “unprivileged.” This means that people who testify in court falsely can not be sued for defamation. Privileged statements are those when free speech is important enough that people should not have to worry about being sued for defamation.
The Clemens vs. McNamee legal battle has been going on for quite some time. It will be interesting to see if it ends up going to trial – and if McNamee wins – as defamation is not any easy thing to prove, shown by the four aforementioned elements.
- Industries: Entertainment & Media
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.