
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 20, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe burgeoning marijuana industry in Colorado has run into yet another legal snafu, as inconsistencies between state and federal laws are preventing businesses and owners from filing for protection under the bankruptcy law.

Attorneys for Sarah and Frank Arenas of Denver filed a 43-page appeal stating that a judge dismissed their August bankruptcy petition in error because their assets were derived primarily from the medical marijuana industry, The Denver Post reported. By refusing to protect such assets in bankruptcy in the same way that other assets are, the appeal argues, the federal government is passively prosecuting crimes that it earlier said it would not.
The Obama administration said in late August that it would not challenge state laws legalizing marijuana as long as strict regulations on the sale and distribution of the drug are enforced, according to The Washington Post.
“The [Arenases] should not be faulted, or more importantly lose the right to a discharge of their debts, for playing by rules created by the same agency that seeks to dismiss their bankruptcy case for breaking those rules,” attorney Daniel Garfield wrote, as cited by The Denver Post. “The federal government has deliberately and actively allowed a legal marijuana industry to flourish in Colorado and not to prosecute participants in that industry. The federal government has made a conscious decision to allow [the Arenases’] otherwise illegal business to operate.”
Either decision is likely to be used as an important precedent going forward. Should the ruling be upheld, it will create more uncertainty in the already somewhat shaky business climate that exists in the Colorado marijuana industry. If the ruling is overturned, businesses in this sector may take it as a sign that the federal government is ready to recognize their legitimacy, perhaps motivating them to fight for other, similar, business rights.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!