Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 26, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAccording to the report, Boeing, Ford, Chevron, Citigroup, Verizon, J.P. Morgan and GM all paid more to their CEOs than they did in corporate taxes. All of these companies but Chevron received money back from the government in the form of a rebate or subsidy. This is despite the fact that the pre-tax revenues for these companies came to more than a combined $74 billion. In all, they received a combined net $1.8 billion from taxpayers – that comes to about $5.69 from every man, woman and child living in the United States.
CEO pay – a contentious issue in the United States – looked strikingly different. All of these CEOs received more than their companies paid in taxes, coming to a combined $121 million, but considering that all but one received money back from the government, this is hardly surprising.
What is striking, however, is that this state of affairs appears to be increasingly common, according to the report. Of the 100 top-earning CEOs in 2013, 29 received a larger salary than their company paid in taxes. On average, these 29 firms reported $817 million in U.S. pre-tax income, received $8 million in tax refunds and paid their CEO $32 million.
Speaking to Reuters, several companies disputed the findings of the Institute for Policy Studies. Verizon told the news source that it paid $422 million in income taxes in 2013 – a considerable difference from the negative $197 million cited in the report. Boeing said that its global 2013 tax bill came to $1.6 billion, but did note that all but $5 million was deferred
By far, the largest tax refund recipient among the 30 top U.S. companies was J.P Morgan, according to the report. Of the $1.8 billion cited as the total refunds received, J.P. Morgan accounted for more than $1.3 billion. The company’s CEO was paid a relatively meager $11.8 million.
It should be noted that a significant portion of J.P. Morgan’s refund came from a tax deductible settlement made last year. According to the company’s website, its total 2013 net income came to $17.9 billion out of $99.8 billion in revenues. Under the U.S. top income rate of 35 percent, its tax bill would ordinarily come to about $6.3 billion.
However, the company agreed to a $13 billion settlement last year for its alleged role in causing the housing crisis, according to Reuters. Of that, $11 billion was tax deductible, which helps to account for a sizeable portion of the difference.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!