Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 26, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAccording to the report, Boeing, Ford, Chevron, Citigroup, Verizon, J.P. Morgan and GM all paid more to their CEOs than they did in corporate taxes. All of these companies but Chevron received money back from the government in the form of a rebate or subsidy. This is despite the fact that the pre-tax revenues for these companies came to more than a combined $74 billion. In all, they received a combined net $1.8 billion from taxpayers – that comes to about $5.69 from every man, woman and child living in the United States.
CEO pay – a contentious issue in the United States – looked strikingly different. All of these CEOs received more than their companies paid in taxes, coming to a combined $121 million, but considering that all but one received money back from the government, this is hardly surprising.
What is striking, however, is that this state of affairs appears to be increasingly common, according to the report. Of the 100 top-earning CEOs in 2013, 29 received a larger salary than their company paid in taxes. On average, these 29 firms reported $817 million in U.S. pre-tax income, received $8 million in tax refunds and paid their CEO $32 million.
Speaking to Reuters, several companies disputed the findings of the Institute for Policy Studies. Verizon told the news source that it paid $422 million in income taxes in 2013 – a considerable difference from the negative $197 million cited in the report. Boeing said that its global 2013 tax bill came to $1.6 billion, but did note that all but $5 million was deferred
By far, the largest tax refund recipient among the 30 top U.S. companies was J.P Morgan, according to the report. Of the $1.8 billion cited as the total refunds received, J.P. Morgan accounted for more than $1.3 billion. The company’s CEO was paid a relatively meager $11.8 million.
It should be noted that a significant portion of J.P. Morgan’s refund came from a tax deductible settlement made last year. According to the company’s website, its total 2013 net income came to $17.9 billion out of $99.8 billion in revenues. Under the U.S. top income rate of 35 percent, its tax bill would ordinarily come to about $6.3 billion.
However, the company agreed to a $13 billion settlement last year for its alleged role in causing the housing crisis, according to Reuters. Of that, $11 billion was tax deductible, which helps to account for a sizeable portion of the difference.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher

For many New Jersey businesses, growth is a primary objective for the New Year. However, it is important to recognize that growth involves both opportunity and risk. For example, business expansion often results in complex contracts, an increased workforce, new regulatory requirements, and heightened exposure to disputes. Without proactive planning, even routine growth can lead […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!