Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 5, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comEstate tax returns filed after July 2015 and now required to file Form 8971 with the IRS Service Center in Cincinnati by February 29, 2016. Schedule A to Form 8971 reports the estate tax value of property passing from an estate or decedent to that beneficiary. Each beneficiary will receive a separate Schedule A reporting the property received by him or her. Form 8971 and Schedule A is a reporting requirement that is separate and distinct from the obligation to file an estate tax return. Form 8971 is not filed as part of the estate tax return.

Notice 2015-57 fixed February 29, 2016 as the due date for all Forms 8971 and all Schedules A, that are required to be filed with IRS after July 31, 2015 and before February 29, 2016. Returns filed after that date will require Form 8971 to be filed no later than the earlier 30 days after the date Form 706, Form 706-NA or Form 706-A is filed (including extensions) or, if the first Form 706, Form 706-NA or Form 706-A is filed after the due date and after July 2015, 30 days after filing.
Penalties for failure to timely file Form 8971 with Schedule(s) A are $50 per day with a maximum penalty of $532,000 per year ($186,000 if taxpayer qualifies for lower penalties). The penalty is $260 per day if filed after 30 days after the due date up to $3,193,000 per year ($1,064,000 if taxpayer qualifies for lower penalties).
In most estates, the distribution has not occurred at the time of filing of the estate tax return so the executor must list all items that could be used, in whole or in part, the fund a beneficiary’s distribution. Many Schedule A will contain duplicate information.
The executor is required to maintain proof of delivery of each beneficiary’s Schedule A in his or her file. Proof of delivery is not to be confused with proof of mailing. Where the value is adjusted in an audit or in Tax Court, a supplemental Form 8971 and Schedule A, reporting only the changed information, must be filed within 30 days of the adjustment. The standard due going forward is Form 8971 and Schedule(s) A are due 30 days after the estate tax return.
We know that a beneficiary may sell or depreciate inherited property and the basis of that property is essential for the beneficiary’s income tax treatment. We suspect IRS is also closing the door on taxpayers who have taken liberties with the basis of inherited property in order to avoid income tax. What is certain is that penalties will be assessed because estates that must file Form 706 receive little sympathy and the preparers will receive even less.
Do you have any questions regarding the filing of Form 8971? Please contact me, Frank L. Brunetti or attorney James F. McDonough with your questions.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!